Bioshock for Shader Model 2.0 instead of 3.0 18 replies

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#11 11 years ago

My price range is not to high, some graphics cards do cost up to $1000 but some are cheaper, I am in Australia so the prices are slighly different as well. And the game could easily be converted to SM2.0 if a tiny bit of work is put into it. Look at Crysis, that has brilliant graphics and its supports SM2.0! If you voted no, I think you are being selfish to other gamers that might want it on Shader Model 2.0. If you have a Shader Model 3.0 card, you have a shader model 3.0 card, but you still don't have to vote no. I think some people misunderstood my question. I didn't say do you have a SM3.0 card, but would you like it if there was a SM2.0 patch? Support your fellow gamers. CoD511 P.S. sorry for the long reply




Oblivious

I tawt I taw a puddy tat...

50 XP

30th December 2002

0 Uploads

2,806 Posts

0 Threads

#12 11 years ago

Not trying to be an a$$ here, but it would seem that a game this advanced would run horrible on just about any sm2.0 model card anyways, regardless of how low your game settings are. Gluttons for punishment? :p

I feel your pain though. When I was using a Radeon 9200 (sm2.0), I was forced to upgrade to play certain games (I forget which). It sucks when a game that is this good is beyond the capabilities of your pc. Every critic seems to agree it's an incredible game. I'll buy it soon enough to be sure.

Good luck!




masked_marsoe VIP Member

Heaven's gonna burn your eyes

50 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

8,063 Posts

0 Threads

#13 11 years ago

A 6800 GT should be about AU$100, probably you could get a lower model for about the AU$70 range first hand.

I don't really see the point in a patch, either way you will need to upgrade sooner or later. Such is the nature of computer games.




emonkies

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

17th July 2003

0 Uploads

15,096 Posts

0 Threads

#14 11 years ago

Not only that but people I have talked to said even after modifiying the game to run SM2.0 it doesnt look near as good.




arcadeplayer987

Revenge was here.

50 XP

25th April 2007

0 Uploads

1,819 Posts

0 Threads

#15 11 years ago
Anlushac11;3880789Not only that but people I have talked to said even after modifiying the game to run SM2.0 it doesnt look near as good.

Still better than nothing




XCON_Faxion

I spend too much time here

50 XP

11th July 2003

0 Uploads

805 Posts

0 Threads

#16 11 years ago

It's more of a performance thing. My GeForce 6800 GT does run SM3.0 but every program that it runs in that mode it runs poorly (Call of Juarez being a good example). Many people who have GeForce 6 series might benifit from SM2.0 support. Although trying to re-optimize the game for SM2.0 may be too much of a hassle for the Devs to bother with.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#17 11 years ago

They should release a patch. Gamers who went with ATI 2-3 years ago spent good money on the there X800's so they deserve to play.




Jax2000

My Name Is Ocho

50 XP

4th July 2005

0 Uploads

138 Posts

0 Threads

#18 11 years ago

try the Nvidia Geforce 8800, its the best DX10 card out there, if thats to pricy, the 8500 which i got is around $100 or less (i got it at its release)

for DX9, the above cards work fine too, if you dont have vista that is.




XCON_Faxion

I spend too much time here

50 XP

11th July 2003

0 Uploads

805 Posts

0 Threads

#19 11 years ago

If you are desperate to get the game running in SM 2.0 try this mod: Making Bioshock Work with SM2.0 Cards! (Work in progress) - 2K Forums




  • 1
  • 2