It's for the Wii. It's going be awful no matter what.
I'll just wait for Goldeneye: Source. :)
I'm spending a year dead for tax reasons.
15th December 2002
It's not even that, though.
If it was made by Rare and based on the original game's premise, it might be epic, like the original. This is just the current license holder cashing in on the only decent Bond game ever released, and they'll miss the point entirely and hash it up.
Either way, Goldeneye with Daniel Craig seems silly.
Danny King | Editor-in-Chief | GameFront.com
Wanna go Double Dutch?
9th December 2003
The original was prety fun, kept us entertained for hours and hours. Doubt a remake would be as much fun, maybe for the 10-12 year old kids though.
Feel me. Do I feel pretty?
15th September 2004
Zamamee;5341025I'll just wait for Goldeneye: Source. :)
Is that still being made? I played a beta of it a while back and loved it.
I haven't really made up my mind about the a Golden Eye remake.
FileTrekker;5341028 Either way, Goldeneye with Daniel Craig seems silly.
Former - FileFront Network Administrator
11th September 2002
It could be because of something simple though, e.g. not having a licence to use Pierce Brosnan's face or something like that!
As for the game itself, I'm not keeping my hopes up, if it was made by rare then it would probably be good even on the wii, but since its made by Activision I'm not so sure, while the trailer does look good (for the wii and I'm one of those who goes for gameplay over graphics!), I personally think that it won't be that good.