How is this game compared to BF: Vietnam?? 4 replies

Please wait...

Dash 8

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

23rd July 2004

0 Uploads

17 Posts

0 Threads

#1 14 years ago

BF: Vietnam pisses me off. people (even the AI) buzzez around trying to get a kill usually with no tactics or co-operation at all! Besides, the speed of the game is just so weird, and it keeps lagging/stutter a lot, so all in all, an un-realistic game. Take my conclusions of BF: Vietnam, is Joint Operations almost the same stuff? perhaps I should wait a few days for Doom III to be released, or perhaps some fellow forum members here could tell me a little about it?




Jacobite

Gonnae no dae that

50 XP

14th November 2003

0 Uploads

99 Posts

0 Threads

#2 14 years ago
Dash 8BF: Vietnam pisses me off. people (even the AI) buzzez around trying to get a kill usually with no tactics or co-operation at all! Besides, the speed of the game is just so weird, and it keeps lagging/stutter a lot, so all in all, an un-realistic game. Take my conclusions of BF: Vietnam, is Joint Operations almost the same stuff? perhaps I should wait a few days for Doom III to be released, or perhaps some fellow forum members here could tell me a little about it?

Joint Ops I would say is worth gettin ,Online play is good ,i find it lags less than BFV and the Helos easier 2 fly ,the game looks fresh on the updated BHD engine ,and if u want good team work join a clan , theres plenty lookin 4 recruits ,if u dont want 2 join a clan there players out there that will join up with u 2 complete a objective anyway, in any team game u get a few lonewolfs its usally newbies gettin used 2 the game or snipers.The games r simular but i think joint ops wins it, thats my thoughts on it.And 4 Doom 3 i think the singleplayer side will b great but multy wont b a patch on the other games already out there, Im gonnae buy Doom 3 & HL2 but ill still b playin Joint Ops aswell :)




Poultry_King

omgwtfhax

50 XP

10th December 2003

0 Uploads

915 Posts

0 Threads

#3 14 years ago

Yea jacobite pretty much said it all.

THe lag is FAR less than BF:V, so that's a definite plus! Flying is a lot easier than BFV, but than that also means that there's none of those "select few 1337 pilots".

Im not going to explain the rest. I would pick Joint Ops over BFV any day.




Dash 8

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

23rd July 2004

0 Uploads

17 Posts

0 Threads

#4 14 years ago

thanks a lot for the help! I think I'm going to get the game.. but then again, Doom III is soon to be released in a few days (isn't it?) and I love the HL and resident evil series aswell But the thing is that I can't afford both Joint Ops and Doom III at once, so to make it quick: which should I get first? Perhaps I should buy Doom III when it's released and while I'm saving up money for Joint Ops I should play BFV?? Or just go straight onto the case and buy Joint Ops? (I don't have any experience with the Doom series before at all)




FN_lewrbm69

It's Not Easy Being Green

50 XP

10th November 2003

0 Uploads

3,372 Posts

0 Threads

#5 14 years ago

BFV is better in than JO in the stbility of the game an how you are able to mod it of JO had more of a platform to edit its maps units an import i might give it a better raiting but i lik it over all.