Are you Glad some members have been banned? 42 replies

Please wait...

Sh0wdowN

Skeptic Extraordinaire.

50 XP

31st December 2003

0 Uploads

7,942 Posts

0 Threads

#11 12 years ago

They had it coming.




Liquid fire

I pretend I'm cooler than AzH

50 XP

10th June 2006

0 Uploads

4,322 Posts

0 Threads

#12 12 years ago

BEEF!!!!!!

and was Jill banned again?




*The.Doctor

Trust me, I'm a Doctor

102,440 XP

25th November 2003

0 Uploads

9,964 Posts

0 Threads

#13 12 years ago

For the most part, yes. Most of them deserved to be banned and will not be missed (by me at least).

There are a few who were well known here that i would be happy to see back though.




HairySheep

I train sheep to cage fight!!

50 XP

8th January 2006

0 Uploads

3,252 Posts

0 Threads

#14 12 years ago

Jill was banned? What?! in that case, no




Relander

Ambassador

50 XP

8th April 2005

0 Uploads

2,538 Posts

0 Threads

#15 12 years ago

Though shouldn't this be obivious? Every single member here is content that some person/people have got banned, answerring "no" effectively means that people aren't content with any ban issued in these forums. At least that's how the question can be easily interpreted.




Ryette

suburban baroness of bud

50 XP

19th April 2005

0 Uploads

1,887 Posts

0 Threads

#16 12 years ago

I can't say I really care either way.




masked_marsoe VIP Member

Heaven's gonna burn your eyes

50 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

8,063 Posts

0 Threads

#17 12 years ago

I am glad some members have been banned. I've never seen anyone banned without just cause, and most of them are perma-banned for breaking the ban-evasion rule.

Some of them I regret seeing them go, but all of them were given chances, and advised of the rules.

And Jill hasn't been banned. Just not as active as ususal.




SVD_Sniper

"Custom User Title" eh?

50 XP

23rd August 2006

0 Uploads

642 Posts

0 Threads

#18 12 years ago

The forums is better off without many of those banned. OF course there will be times when you think it was a bad idea, because you liked the person being banned. However, you cannot have selective rules.

If a member with 4710571751078975090171 posts and is unanimously popular starts continiously breaking rules, then (s)he has to go. I mean, sure its a little sad, but as a member I accept that the moderators/admins decision is final. they are the gods of this little world, and if they decide someone must go, then they go. If we continue posting here, and using the forums we accept these rules, we accept that they are the decision makers and are doign whats best.

Besides, the rules are straightforwards and reasonable. Whats so hard about sticking to them?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#19 12 years ago

If they're banned then they obviously did something to annoy or piss off the staff team so in that respect I can say the forum is better off without any annoying members. I think thats something we can all agree on, right?




masked_marsoe VIP Member

Heaven's gonna burn your eyes

50 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

8,063 Posts

0 Threads

#20 12 years ago
they obviously did something to annoy or piss off the staff team

Minitrue mark post doubleplusungood crimethink. Miniluv remake goodthink fullwise.