Half Life 2 graphics owns Far Cry defineatly. Far Cry playermodels look like plastic piece of shit even on maximum detail. Half Life 2 looks more life-like especially the look of the human skin.
I hated Far Cry from the beginning.
Its wrong. Too bright and cheerful for an FPS.
Too much greenery and all. Just, not usual.
Far Cry tried to make something "different", i say, they failed.
Don't even think of comparing it to HL2 or D3!
:agreed: I think Doom3 will have a edge on graphics, only because their levels are smaller so they can put extra work on the walls, floor or weapons. HL2's levels are huge and have outdoor area's. They probaly couldn't of had the detail of D3 in HL2's huge levels. If they had done it, think how long the loading times would be :lol:. D3's multiplayer it limited to 4 players because the graphics are at such a high level if they had had like 16 players you's get a lot of lag. HL2 on the other hand can have up to(what is it 32 or 16 players?)32 players.
azzkikerI hated Far Cry from the beginning. Its wrong. Too bright and cheerful for an FPS. Too much greenery and all. Just, not usual.
EXACTLY! :nodding: And HL2 will blow EVERYTHING out of the FREAKING WATER! There will be NO WATER LEFT! :naughty: Which game is it that supports like 128 players? I thought it was going to be HL2..
BF2 will support loads of players. Thought it was in the 100 range. Though i can't remember(i can't remember things i don't give a shit about :p).
Then comes Halo 2 and you guys will cry.
:Puzzled: :glares: Thats what YOU think
Yes, actually, it is what I think. :p
Obviously, if he typed it. :uhoh:
Dread thinks I'm a special person
22nd December 2003
In an interview I read a while ago it was mentioned that there would be a "surprise" for HL2 multiplayers. Has anybody any idea yet what this surprise might be?