M79its laggy if you either have a bad connection or a pc.
:eek: its deffinutly not my pc :uhm: and Breakthrough is generally laggy online, unless u have like a 10mb connection? lol
is COD worth getting? and are there any mods for it. i wouldnt play it for more than a week without mods
Go to the COD Forums and ask there. And I think it's worth getting. There are a lot of mods for it as well. www.codfiles.com
Spearhead is deff the better expansion pack. The first level is a D-Day Airborne drop one which is pretty sweet and you also get to play the Battle of the Bulge. Spearhead is basically the movie Band of Brothers put into a game. I play Breakthrough for multiplayer only because it has more skins, weapons and maps. It's not laggy for me and my crappy 56k modem and bad graphic card. I have 32MB VRAM 256 (actually 224) MB RAM Pentium 4 1.61 GHz. I'm trying to get an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro card soon. :cool: I recently got into playing Battlefield 1942 and it's a really good game but also really laggy. I can't even walk around on any server I go to but if you have a good graphic card and fast connection I recommend you get this game!
I'm lying when I say trust me
8th June 2004
I would recommend getting Spearhead over Breakthrough. There are a hell of a lot more people playing Spearhead than Breakthrough.
I dont suggest you get either. I have spearhead and it's horrible. (IMO) And everyone says breakthrough is worse, so yeah...don't get either.
Spearhead is much MUCH better than Allied Assualt.
SPEARHEAD IS GREAT!! breakthrough is troublesome (ive just started a thread about it) but still worth it, the new multiplayer maps were pretty good and the missions were good.
now this is just my opinion so pls don't flame me for it: MOHAA>SH>BT. AA is the classic. its what most war fps games are compared to imo and will always be at the top. SH is great to by all means. but it feels too arcade like. it feels faster. BT is basically SH but with more stuff.