I have been playing around with the A2U logo and I was wondering if people thought I was actually making it better?
The first one is the current one, and the second is the WIP.
My problem is that after spending hours messing around I start thinking that different = better, which is not always the case.
55 XP
15th March 2005
0 Uploads
25,940 Posts
0 Threads
The second one is definitely better. Much easier to read. The first seems a bit blurry, actually. You might consider some kind of drop shadow on the "Star Trek", though, because it gets a little hard to read as it crosses the II.
Love the second one :)
Inyri ForgeThe second one is definitely better. Much easier to read. The first seems a bit blurry, actually. You might consider some kind of drop shadow on the "Star Trek", though, because it gets a little hard to read as it crosses the II.
I did notice that about the first one. It looked ok in PS, but when you look at it with a browser it does look awful.
Thanks for the feedback, I will tweak it a bit tommorow.
Yes, the second one is the best by far. Looking forward to seeing it finished
The cake is a lie.There is no cake.
50 XP
13th November 2004
0 Uploads
3,926 Posts
0 Threads
I agree with the second. Also, listen to Inyri, she knows how to make things look better :)
I'm with everyone. .the 2nd one has a sharpishness to it! It looks good
Number #2 All The Way ;)
I did start off by adding a outer glow (I was already using the drop shadow colored yellow) but it didn't work out to well so I ended up copying the layer style from the upgrade project up to the star trek, and then darkening it so it didn't look to bright next to Armada.
All of this left the II a bit dull, so I ended up adding an outer glow to get it to fit in a bit better.
The starting point, for reference
and where we are now:-
I am not sure if the Star Trek is to bright now, what do you think?
55 XP
15th March 2005
0 Uploads
25,940 Posts
0 Threads
I like that one a lot better. The slight black outline makes it quite a bit easier to read. :)
- 1
- 2