you killed star trek not b&b you guys did,i hope they never ever make another star trek for tv becuse it will never be good enough for you. star trek was entertanment not a church, look up the word canon please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon
of course we killed it ... because it was the child gene roddenberry would have never wanted to have ... i'm sorry for killing your little thread off ... but enterprise sucks my a** ... ok? that was the worst installment of all ... even the idea to go back pre-tos should have told berman and the other idiots at paramount that it will be cancelled ... but they're all just greedy-hollywood-bitches ... just concentrating on exploiting star trek to its finale ... and i for my part am glad that it was cancelled ... because for the first time ... fans stood up united and told paramount to shove that pseudo-trek back where it came from ... and all this fancy-pants explanations ... like, we wanted to tell how the klingons changed, what happened to the borg, why jim wasn't first man in a parallel univere, why archer was in the 26th century, why romulans did have visual contact with humans pre-tos .... all BULL-CRAP ... so since you appear to be of a newer star trek generation and are mostly based on superb FX than rather good story-telling and consistency ... you can go back watching farscape or babylon5 ... ehh? and about the church thing ... although i'm venting of a little plasma here ... neither do i believe in star trek in biblical-style ... i just think that treating fans this way ain't right ... we all know why the klingons have no riffles on their forehead ... because tos had no "real" buget ... but we do not need berman go back in time an explain one inconsistency with a rather stupid idea just because he wants to make cash! that is also one of the main reasons why i love star wars ... no matter what GL has done to it ... because as long as the creator does this changes, i'm da-kor ... because if his word ain't cannon, whose is?
dude im 37, and i liked the entertanment i don't care if it fit into a puzzle, it was fun to see new star trek every week good or bad, and everything on tv is made to make money. or it would be free
It was bad acting. It was unintresting. It was cancelled.
yeah, but DUDE ... there are people who'd rather like to see a STAR TREK show actually fit in to STAR TREK universe ... and if you want stupid entertainment i can only recommend again ... go watch farscape and babylon5 ... :naughty: ... good an clean argumented Saquist ... if i'd only though of that before!:D :smokin:
where was the star trek universe gonna go more 24th century,maybe they milked a sour cow but look at star trek 11 there rewriting everthing, b5 was a cheap knock off of ds9 just like lost in space was to tos and farscape was boring didn't even finish the first one
DS9 Great acting + Defiant NCC 74205 orignal design = 7 year contract
ds9 was good in it's third year, but seasons one and two were really slow and that pic is the prototype
NX 01 Akiraprise vs NX 74205 Defiant
Defiant, an orginal model with hard points derivitive of Design and functionality of class before it while redefining Both definition and purpose of War.
Akira-Prise As the nickname eludes, a rip-off of a vessel designed for First Contact. The first vessel designed by CGI for close inspection for big and small screen.
Possible reasons. (Budget, lack or orignality, time constraints, misappropriation of necessary funds, or just plain taking the intelligence of Fanatics for granted.
I don't take kindly to obvious attempts to ridicule my Intelligence.
i was talking about my avitar not the nx-01