[color=blue]I don't get it. Why dont people create more maps with 1 life? Doesn't anyone think that it would kind of be more interesting? If not in RTCW, at least in ET, where you can crouch...[/color] [color=blue]The gameplay would be much more different (more realistic), and people wouldnt take their single life for granted. There would be alot more strategy.[/color] [color=blue]What I see is that everyone just likes to empty their clips in the air, hoping they will hit someone.[/color] [color=blue]Oh and if you say "but panzers kill in one shot"... i say... ya.. panzers do kill in one shot... not that im a panzer pu ssy, but tough luck, learn to not get hit!!![/color] Tell me what you guys think.
alrighty you have played shrub mod right 5 lives ....the hole power of the game is to keep those maxlives..so medic are on there toes and genarally the best medics ya can get.....if they were to die ,with 1 life ...my opinion is rtcw wouldn,t rock so hard,......same with wild west ..how boring would it be if the miner was shot dead.....then the objective could not be completed.....sorry mate :smokin:
iam not seeing this as being a great idea soz ................as i feel it would ruin rtcw to bits ???:nodding: :nodding:
I would die without my life.
19th January 2004
I agree Win. I really can't see RtCW or WW with only 1 life...Only if you want to get it boring...Or not played...
PS: I wrote this response in small font to show that we can read and understand as well. So if policeman1313 can read this, that proves that the large font he used is not really useful for him (and for us)
if i can throw my 2 cents in...i agree that 1 life would be xtremly boring, even with 5 lives, you tend to be pretty careful about tapping out, and hope that nobody takes the time gib ya. as for panzers, 1 per team is doable, but when theres 3 or 4 or 5 of them, and it seems everytime ya spawn, sum1s drillin ya, its a tad frustatin!!!...and there is no learnin to get hit, i've been around corners, and still manage to get clipped....thats one of the benifits of WW, NO PANZERS! this is only my opinion. cheers rebel
People do play "One Life to Live" (1L2L) but it is usually for special events. El Dragon has been itching for one of these nights. For a good game I think you'd have to have a good 50 person server to make a good match but I've never played it before. Personally I think a 5 life server would be great. 14 is WAY WAY WAY to many. Even just tapping out, I don;t go through that many lives per game. 8 is when the challenge starts I think....
Ah, the whole point of having one live would be to get a team effort type of thing going, not just people spreading out like sewer rats. But i guess 5 lives isnt that bad neither, but its funny, i go though some matches with 5 deaths, 4 of them being TKs. My skill doesnt seem to show because of all these TKs... OH AND BECAUSE I RUN OUT OF AMMO, AND THE NOOB LUTS JUST THROW A SUPPORT FIRE RIGHT... IN... FRONT ... OF ... ME instead of giving out 2 ammo packs and leaving some bar for that poussy support.
Tbh neither RTCW or ET were made to be 1L2L games. It just doesnt work when you have onjectives to complete. Although if some1 builds a map theres a possibilty it will work.
Any1 played Iceworld from CS, very basic map that just owned completely! Similar map could be fun in ET
[color=red]RtCW just isn't a 1L2L game. it just...wouldn't work.[/color]
you got it mate its a team based game ..you need to be alive to have a team ..lmao :deal:
http://www.the-wildwest.co.uk/ cheers and peace to ya all :beer:
You could play last man standing mode in ET.