WiP galactic map poll -1 reply

Please wait...

Gorbeh

Doctor

50 XP

24th July 2006

0 Uploads

1,529 Posts

0 Threads

#1 11 years ago

Ok, what do you want:

Three campaigns with 58 planets each: Map isn't as cluttered Easier to manage Normal sized planets Less lag

One campaign with 167 planets: Map is cluttered More of a strategic aspect Planets are smaller More lag




shak4l 01

Xj owns all TIEs

50 XP

8th November 2006

0 Uploads

1,102 Posts

0 Threads

#2 11 years ago

Can you do both eg. three 58-planet campaigns and the 167-planet campaign? Otherwise, i vote for 3 camps.




The_Sith_Lord

Supreme Emperor of the Galaxy

50 XP

24th May 2006

0 Uploads

1,095 Posts

0 Threads

#3 11 years ago

I prefer one large campaign to conquer the galaxy to my will and the Empire. There are already smaller campaigns in the game. You may create 3 smaller campaigns later.




Gorbeh

Doctor

50 XP

24th July 2006

0 Uploads

1,529 Posts

0 Threads

#4 11 years ago

I could do both but I would have to make two entries of each planet, so unless someone wants to do that I won't, we only have two people so my time is better spent elsewhere.




The_Sith_Lord

Supreme Emperor of the Galaxy

50 XP

24th May 2006

0 Uploads

1,095 Posts

0 Threads

#5 11 years ago

why 2 entries if the same planet can be found in the 167 planets map and one of the other 3?




Gorbeh

Doctor

50 XP

24th July 2006

0 Uploads

1,529 Posts

0 Threads

#6 11 years ago

Because I would have to scale the planets down for the 167 planet campaign, and if the planets were little on the 58 planet campaign everything would look really far apart.




The_Sith_Lord

Supreme Emperor of the Galaxy

50 XP

24th May 2006

0 Uploads

1,095 Posts

0 Threads

#7 11 years ago

Ah now its clearer. I can suggest this. In the 58 planets maps take mostly the core and middle range planets so that it wouldn't show far apart.What you think?




Kelathin

JoJ mod leader

50 XP

2nd July 2006

0 Uploads

1,267 Posts

0 Threads

#8 11 years ago

167 planets is complete foolishness. You'll lag even high end pcs. On a 2.2 duo core you would push it




The_Sith_Lord

Supreme Emperor of the Galaxy

50 XP

24th May 2006

0 Uploads

1,095 Posts

0 Threads

#9 11 years ago

What about reducing the number to 120?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#10 11 years ago

Don't push yourselve gorneh, not even 2 gigs a ram could handle that much, thats about ho much I have.