True sith lord. -1 reply

Please wait...

jarock0

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

6th April 2008

0 Uploads

18 Posts

0 Threads

#1 10 years ago

Well many people have been debateing on who is the true sith lord well come here and debate.On the list below is the sith lord's choose who you think is sith lord but I'd say go to the wookiepedia to study them,and see if they fit.Now let the debate begun.

Brotherhood of the Sith

Revan's Sith Empire

Sith Triumvirate

120px-DNs.jpg magnify-clip.png Darth Nihilus, Lord of Hunger

New Sith Empire

Brotherhood of Darkness

120px-Kaan.jpg magnify-clip.png Kaan, leader of the Brotherhood of Darkness.

Order of the Sith Lords/ Rule of Two

120px-ZannahRuleOfTwo.JPG magnify-clip.png Darth Bane and Darth Zannah.

All Sith following the Rule of Two, both master and apprentice, held the title of Dark Lord of the Sith. This list is in chronological order.

Lumiya's Sith

120px-Darthcaedus.JPG magnify-clip.png Darth Caedus.

New Sith Order/ Rule of One

120px-Krayt5.jpg magnify-clip.png Darth Krayt leader and founder of the new Sith Order.

Unknown Time Period




Jedijax

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

9th October 2007

0 Uploads

575 Posts

0 Threads

#2 10 years ago

Many have been debating? Really? Who's the True Sith Lord? Uhm... according to what?... I have stated Sith Lords like Revan are not true Sith per se, but many included in the list are Sith Lords to the core. I wouldn't ask who the True Sith Lord is, but rather who ARE, since there are many who fit the criteria. By criteria, I mean the original Sith doctrine born in Ziost and Korriban. However, such is the ancient Sith Empire; if one were to accept Darth Bane's reforms over those of the original Sith Lords, things would definitely change. As long as an individual is born/brought from a very early age into the Sith culture and society, i. e. as along as they are educated since childhood in the Sith traditions, I consider them Sith. Jedi turned to the Dark Side, like The Revanchist (I know you love the monicker!!), or fallen Force-users like Aleema Keto, are Sith Lords to me only by name. Personaly, I find the very meaning of Sith Lord to be embodied in Naga Sadow, for he is as Sith as they come!! The most powerful Sith Lord I have ever known, save perhaps a reborn Palpatine, and the most ruthless and ambitious of them all. However, one cannot ignore Palpatine is also a deadly contender, the very first Sith Lord to really rule the entire galaxy!! Hell, even Bane has a place in my heart, even if he was brought into Kaan's Brotherhood of Darkness quite late and transformed the organization completely!! The guy is responsible of crushing the criteria I defend as far as Sith Lords go, but he's so damn Sith!! =p Guys like Ulic Quel-Droma, Revan, Vader and Caedus aren't really Sith, since their motivations and actions tend to be those of a tragic hero persona, a fallen knight, rather than a Dark Lord.




dxm16

DarthHK

50 XP

21st April 2008

0 Uploads

180 Posts

0 Threads

#3 10 years ago

lol i think for the "True Sith Lord" they'll make up a completely different character. i think his name will be bob. he'll have a pet horse the color of alfredo :D but this is just mere speculation on my part




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#4 10 years ago

well the 'true sith lord' quite difficult they all did many things but juging on success i will definately on on darth Lrayt,he took power after Sideous' rule even though he lost many battles,not forgetting to obi-wan,he did succeed the most i find,he partially owned the galaxy at one point,but then many did,such as Revan...well he almost did...well kinda lol but many of them did well so bit of an evil question don't you think?




Darth Dracon

Dark Lord and Master

50 XP

13th April 2007

0 Uploads

1,555 Posts

0 Threads

#5 10 years ago

jarock0;4379779Well many people have been debateing on who is the true sith lord well come here and debate.On the list below is the sith lord's choose who you think is sith lord but I'd say go to the wookiepedia to study them,and see if they fit.Now let the debate begun.

Brotherhood of the Sith Revan's Sith Empire Sith Triumvirate 120px-DNs.jpg magnify-clip.png Darth Nihilus, Lord of Hunger New Sith Empire Brotherhood of Darkness 120px-Kaan.jpg magnify-clip.png Kaan, leader of the Brotherhood of Darkness. Order of the Sith Lords/ Rule of Two 120px-ZannahRuleOfTwo.JPG magnify-clip.png Darth Bane and Darth Zannah. All Sith following the Rule of Two, both master and apprentice, held the title of Dark Lord of the Sith. This list is in chronological order. Lumiya's Sith 120px-Darthcaedus.JPG magnify-clip.png Darth Caedus. New Sith Order/ Rule of One 120px-Krayt5.jpg magnify-clip.png Darth Krayt leader and founder of the new Sith Order. Unknown Time Period

I don't know about 'true Sith Lord', but you would have to examine each "Sith Lord's" history including their time era, the situations that created them, the reason the became Sith Lords and their contributions to the Sith. I would include to a list of above criteria with the following: King Adas Darth Andeddu Darth Sidious Darth Bane Marka Ragnos Tulak Horde Ajunta Pall Naga Sadow Darth Plagueis Darth Dracon :beer: :lol:




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#6 10 years ago

well still they all achieved one thing or another some controlled part of the galaxy or planets or just some land others were kick-ass in lightsaber combat,some in force,some in both others had massive armies

to get to the point they all kicked ass in a way and NORMALLY had quite a big body count:)




jarock0

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

6th April 2008

0 Uploads

18 Posts

0 Threads

#7 10 years ago

Yea but depending on choice sometime's though.




Jedijax

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

9th October 2007

0 Uploads

575 Posts

0 Threads

#8 10 years ago

As I stated earlier, it is merely a matter of which Sith doctrine you accept: The Rule of One or The Rule of Two. Most people think the only difference is how many Sith Lords are in the galaxy at a given time, but it is much more complicated than that. It doesn't matter if you control the galaxy or land, or if you "kick-ass" in lightsaber combat, since such qualities are not privative to Sith. We are talking about Sith-raised individuals with very specific traits. And, once again, it all falls to the school of thought you adhere to, either the original Ancient Sith's dogma, or the New Sith dogma. It is as simple as that.




Medianoche

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

14th June 2008

0 Uploads

14 Posts

0 Threads

#9 10 years ago

I'd go with Darth Vader, or Darth Sidious...lol




Darth Dracon

Dark Lord and Master

50 XP

13th April 2007

0 Uploads

1,555 Posts

0 Threads

#10 10 years ago
Jedijax;4386204As I stated earlier, it is merely a matter of which Sith doctrine you accept: The Rule of One or The Rule of Two. Most people think the only difference is how many Sith Lords are in the galaxy at a given time, but it is much more complicated than that. It doesn't matter if you control the galaxy or land, or if you "kick-ass" in lightsaber combat, since such qualities are not privative to Sith. We are talking about Sith-raised individuals with very specific traits. And, once again, it all falls to the school of thought you adhere to, either the original Ancient Sith's dogma, or the New Sith dogma. It is as simple as that.[/quote] Yes, yes. And No. Yes because it does matter to which school of thought you apply yourself to, no because the Rule of Two was established by Bane and the Rule of One by Krayt. Damn those retconning Sons-o-bitches! So the Dark Jedi Exiles went to Korriban, conquered the Sith race, became Dark Lords of the Sith, with many followers and many 'Sith Lords' that were once Jedi, bred with the Red Skinned Sith race, came back to the Republic, kicked a little ass and got a-whoopin', then disappeared for a while. Then several Sith Lords start popping up here and there until the Mandalorian Wars and subsequent Jedi Civil War. Then there quite a few Sith Lords a-runnin' 'round. Sith get defeated, and go back into hiding, Master Phanius with the whole Darth Ruin bit and starts the new Sith wars yadda, yadda which leads to Bane duping Kaan into using the thought bomb and leaving Bane as the only Sith Lord left in the Galaxy. Then the Rule of Many becomes the Rule of Two. Goddamn retconners trying to say that the Rule of Two was created before Bane. That was the first I ever heard about it. But I do give the point that Marka Ragnos appointed Exar Kun as Sith Lord and Qel-Droma as his apprentice, so there was a Rule of Two at that time, but that doesn't mean that there weren't other Sith Lords somewhere else, que no? [quote=Medianoche;4387923]I'd go with Darth Vader, or Darth Sidious...lol

Vader was framed.:lol: