I didn't make it!
To the site ----->Articles : Introducing The GeForce GTX 680 GPU - GeForce
From Fermi to Kepler Every two years or so, NVIDIA engineers set out to design a new GPU architecture. The architecture defines a GPU's building blocks, how they're connected, and how they work. The architecture is the basis not just for a single chip but a family of chips that serves a whole spectrum of systems, from high performance PCs to wafer thin notebooks, from medical workstations to supercomputers. It is the blueprint for every NVIDIA GPU for the next two years.
Just over two years ago, NVIDIA launched the Fermi architecture with the GeForce GTX 480. Named after the Italian nuclear physicist Enrico Fermi, this new architecture brought two key advancements. First, it brought full geometry processing to the GPU, enabling a key DirectX 11 technique called tessellation with displacement mapping. Used in games such as Battlefield 3 and Crysis 2, this technique greatly improves the geometric realism of water, terrain, and game characters. Second, Fermi greatly improved the GPU's performance in general computation, and today, Fermi GPUs power three out of the top five supercomputers in the world.
Today, NVIDIA is launching Kepler, the much anticipated successor to the Fermi architecture. With Kepler we wanted not only to build the world's fastest GPU, but also the world's most power efficient. Feature wise, we added new technologies that fundamentally improve the smoothness of each frame and the richness of the overall experience.
Why Is Power Efficiency Important? When we first launched Fermi with the GeForce GTX 480, people told us how much they loved the performance, but they also told us they wished it consumed less power. Gamers want top performance, but they want it in a quiet, power efficient form factor. The feedback we received from Fermi really drove this point home. With Kepler, one of our top priorities was building a flagship GPU that was also a pleasure to game with.
Kepler introduces two key changes that greatly improve the GPU's efficiency. First, we completely redesigned the streaming multiprocessor, the most important building block of our GPUs, for optimal performance per watt. Second, we added a feature called GPU Boost that dynamically increases clock speed to improve performance within the card's power budget.
Kepler's new SM, called SMX, is a radical departure from past designs. SMX eliminates the Fermi "2x" processor clock and uses the same base clock across the GPU. To balance out this change, SMX uses an ultra wide design with 192 CUDA cores. With a total of 1536 cores across the chip, the GeForce GTX 680 handily outperforms the GeForce GTX 580.The GeForce GTX 680 GPU is made up of 3.54 billion transistors. The entire chip has been designed for optimal performance per watt.But what's benefited the most is power efficiency. Compared to the original Fermi SM, SMX has twice the performance per watt. Put another way, given a watt of power, Kepler's SMX can do twice the amount of work as Fermi's SM. And this is measured apples-to-apples, on the same manufacturing process. Imagine a conventional 50 watt light bulb that shines as brightly as a 100 watt light bulb—that's what Kepler's like when gaming.GPU Boost SMX doubled the performance per watt, but what if the GPU wasn't actually using its full power capacity? Going back to the light bulb analogy, what if a 100 watt light bulb was sometimes running at 90 watts, or even 80 watts? As it turns out, that's exactly how GPUs behave today.
The reason for this is actually pretty simple. Like light bulbs, GPUs are designed to operate under a certain wattage. This number is called the thermal design point, or TDP. For a high-end GPU, the TDP has typically been about 250 watts. You can interpret this number as saying: this GPU's cooler can remove 250 watts of heat away from the GPU. If it goes over this limit for an extended period of time, the GPU will be forced to throttle down its clock speed to prevent overheating. What this also means is, to get the maximum performance, the GPU should operate close to its TDP, without ever exceeding it.
In reality, GPUs rarely reach their TDP when playing even the most intensive 3D games. This is because different games consume different amounts of power and the GPU's TDP is measured using the worst case. Popular games like Battlefield 3 or Crysis 2 consume far less power than a GPU's TDP rating. Only a few synthetic benchmarks can push GPUs to their TDP limit.
For example, say your GPU has a TDP of 200 watts. What this means is that in the worst case, your GPU will consume 200 watts of power. If you happen to be playing Battlefield 3, it may draw as little as 150 watts. In theory, your GPU could safely operate at a higher clock speed to tap into this available headroom. But since it doesn't know the power requirements of the application ahead of time, it sticks to the most conservative clock speed. Only when you quit the game does it reduce to a lower clock speed for the desktop environment.
GPU Boost changes all this. Instead of running the GPU at a clock speed that is based on the most power hungry app, GPU Boost automatically adjusts the clock speed based on the power consumed by the currently running app. To take our Battlefield 3 example, instead of running at 150 watts and leaving performance on the table, GPU Boost will dynamically increase the clock speed to take advantage of the extra power headroom.
How It Works The most important thing to understand about GPU Boost is that it works through real time hardware monitoring as opposed to application based profiles. As an algorithm, it attempts to find what is the appropriate GPU frequency and voltage for a give moment in time. It does this by reading a huge swathe of data such as GPU temperature, hardware utilization, and power consumption. Depending on these conditions, it will raise the clock and voltage accordingly to extract maximum performance within the available power envelop. Because all this is done via realtime hardware monitoring, GPU Boost requires no application profiles. As new games are released, even if you don't update your drivers, GPU Boost "just works."
How Much Boost? Because GPU Boost happens in realtime and the boost factor varies depending on exactly what's being rendered, it's hard to pin the performance gain down to a single number. To help clarify the typical performance gain, all Kepler GPUs with GPU Boost will list two clock speeds on its specification sheet: the base clock and the boost clock. The base clock equates to the current graphics clock on all NVIDIA GPUs. For Kepler, that's also the minimum clock speed that the GPU cores will run at in an intensive 3D application. The boost clock is the typical clock speed that the GPU will run at in a 3D application.
For example, the GeForce GTX 680 has a base clock of 1006 MHz and a boost clock of 1058 MHz. What this means is that in intensive 3D games, the lowest the GPU will run at is 1006 MHz, but most of the time, it'll likely run at around 1058 MHz. It won't run exactly at this speed--based on realtime monitoring and feedback, it may go higher or lower, but in most cases it will run close to this speed.
GPU Boost doesn't take away from overclocking. In fact, with GPU Boost, you now have more than one way to overclock your GPU. You can still increase the base clock just like before and the boost clock will increase correspondingly. Alternatively, you can increase the power target. This is most useful for games that are consuming near 100% of this power target.
Genuinely Smoother Gameplay Despite the gorgeous graphics seen in many of today's games, there are still some highly distracting artifacts that appear in gameplay despite our best efforts to suppress them. The most jarring of these is screen tearing. Tearing is easily observed when the mouse is panned from side to side. The result is that the screen appears to be torn between multiple frames with an intense flickering effect. Tearing tends to be aggravated when the framerate is high since a large number of frames are in flight at a given time, causing multiple bands of tearing.
An example of screen tearing in Battlefield 3. Vertical sync (V-Sync) is the traditional remedy to this problem, but as many gamers know, V-Sync isn't without its problems. The main problem with V-Sync is that when the framerate drops below the monitor's refresh rate (typically 60 fps), the framerate drops disproportionately. For example, dropping slightly below 60 fps results in the framerate dropping to 30 fps. This happens because the monitor refreshes at fixed internals (although an LCD doesn't have this limitation, the GPU must treat it as a CRT to maintain backward compatibility) and V-Sync forces the GPU to wait for the next refresh before updating the screen with a new image. This results in notable stuttering when the framerate dips below 60, even if just momentarily.
When V-Sync is enabled and the framerate drops below the monitor's refresh rate, the framerate disproportionately, causing stuttering. With NVIDIA's new Release 300 drivers, we are introducing a new option in the control panel called Adaptive V-Sync. Adaptive V-Sync combines the benefit of V-Sync while minimizing its downside. With Adaptive V-Sync, V-Sync is enabled only when the framerate exceeds the refresh rate of the monitor. When the framerate drops below this rate, V-Sync is automatically disabled, minimizing stuttering in games.
FXAA: Anti-Aliasing at Warp Speed Nothing ruins a beautiful looking game like jaggies. They makes straight lines look crooked and generate distracting crawling patterns when the camera is in motion. The fix for jaggies is anti-aliasing, but today's method of doing anti-aliasing is very costly to frame rates. To make matters worse, their effectiveness at removing jaggies has diminished in modern game engines.
Almost all games make use of a form of antialiasing called multi-sample anti-aliasing (MSAA). MSAA renders the screen at an extra high resolution then down samples the image to reduce the appearance of aliasing. The main problem with this is technique is that it requires a tremendous amount of video memory. For example, 4x MSAA requires four times the video memory of standard rendering. In practice, a lot of gamers are forced to disable MSAA in order to maintain reasonable performance.
FXAA is a new way of performing antialiasing that's fast, effective, and optimized for modern game engines. Instead of rendering everything at four times the resolution, FXAA picks out the edges in a frame based on contrast detection. It then smoothes out the aliased edges based on their gradient. All this is a done as a lightweight, post processing shader.
FXAA is not only faster than 4xMSAA, but produces higher quality results in game engines that make use of extensive post processing. Click here for an interactive comparison. Compared to 4xMSAA, FXAA produces comparable if not smoother edges. But unlike 4xMSAA, it consumes no additional memory and runs almost as fast as no antialiasing. FXAA has the added benefit that it works on transparent geometry such as foliage and helps reduce shader based aliasing that often appears on shiny materials.
TXAA: Even Higher Quality Than FXAA Computer generated effects in films spend a huge amount of computing resources on ant-aliasing. For games to truly approach film quality, developers need new antialiasing techniques that bringing even higher quality without compromising performance.
With Kepler, NVIDIA has invented an even higher quality AA mode called TXAA that is designed for direct integration into game engines. TXAA combines the raw power of MSAA with sophisticated resolve filters similar to those employed in CG films. In addition, TXAA can also jitter sample locations between frames for even higher quality.
TXAA is available with two modes: TXAA 1, and TXAA 2. TXAA 1 offers visual quality on part with 8xMSAA with the performance similar to 2xMSAA, while TXAA 2 offers image quality that’s superior to 8xMSAA, with performance comparable to 4xMSAA.
NVIDIA Surround on a Single GeForce GTX 680 Nothing is as thrilling as playing your favorite games across three monitors. At 5760 x 1080, the expanded field of view fully engages your peripheral vision and provides a super immersive experience in racing and flight simulators. Previously, two NVIDIA GPUs were required to support three monitors. On Kepler, one card powers three monitors for gaming, with the option for a forth monitor for web or IM.
Quality Settings: Crysis 2, 30.33 FPS: DirectX 11 Ultra Upgrade installed, high-resolution textures enabled, Extreme detail level. Deus Ex: Human Revolution, 46.20 FPS: Highest possible settings, tessellation enabled, FXAA High enabled. Just Cause 2, 46.60 FPS: Maximum settings, CUDA water enabled, 4xMSAA, 16xAF. Left 4 Dead 2, 126.10 FPS: Maximum settings, 4xMSAA, 16xAF. Mafia 2, 51.35 FPS: Maximum settings, PhysX Medium enabled, AA enabled, AF enabled. Metro 2033, 40.72 FPS: DirectX 11 enabled, Depth of Field disabled, tessellation enabled, PhysX disabled, 4xMSAA, 16xAF. Portal 2, 127.90 FPS: Maximum settings, 4xMSAA, 16xAF. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, 59.55 FPS: Ultra preset, Bethesda high-resolution texture pack, indoor cave scene.
Conclusion The GeForce GTX 680 is quite unlike any flagship graphics card we've ever built. We've built the fastest GPU in the world for many generations now. With Kepler, we wanted to do more than just repeat that feat.
Kepler is really about starting from first principles and asking: beyond performance, how can we improve the gaming experience as a whole?
Gamers told us they want GPUs that are cooler, quieter, and more power efficient. So we re-designed the architecture to do just that. The GeForce GTX 680 consumes less power than any flagship GPU since the GeForce 8800 Ultra, yet it outperforms every GPU we or anyone else have ever built.
We wanted to make gaming not just faster, but smoother. FXAA and the new TXAA does both. Games get super smooth edges without tanking the performance.
Adaptive V-Sync improves upon a feature that many gamers swear by. Now you can play with V-sync enabled and not worry about sudden dips in framerate.
Finally, a single GPU now powers a full NVIDIA Surround setup plus an accessory display. There is simply no better way to play a racing game or flight simulator. Add in NVIDIA PhysX technology, and the GTX 680 delivers an amazingly rich gaming experience.
Kepler is the outcome of over four years of research and development by some of the best and brightest engineers at NVIDIA. We hope you'll have as much fun gaming on our new GPU as we had building it.
1st January 2005
Good performance for the money but I'm not sure I like how they implemented GPU Boost. They say it's designed to kick in on lower resource games where higher clocks are possible. Most that OC their GPUs do it to get better performance in higher resource games, not in ones they're already getting plenty high FPS in. In fact some prefer to use FPS limiters in such games to avoid frame rates that are WAY higher than necessary, which can sometimes cause overheating and even stuttering. Worse yet, GPU Boost cannot be disabled. I have to wonder if it's holding back the OCing potential. Other than that I'd like to see a single dual link DVI version with full width exhaust vent.
I take what n0e says way too seriously
20th November 2007
That was my thoughts as well. I'd rather just stick to 60 or 100 FPS on low-resource games, rather than crank out 200 FPS while producing more heat and using my power than I need to. Heat is a very precious commodity in an upstairs bedroom.
What does the Fox say?
23rd November 2002
I don't think that is quite what they meant. It sounds like they are they are saying that there is a minimum "intensive 3D clock", and a minimum "Aero/3D" clock.
1058 max 1006 min for intensive 3D (Modern Gaming) 400 min for non-intensive 3D (Retro gaming/Windows 7 desktop)
I still share the same complaint. This will likely cause frame-rate consistency issues for more modern games, lowering the clocks when the game needs higher clocks the most.
1st January 2005
Monster_user;5628509I don't think that is quite what they meant. It sounds like they are they are saying that there is a minimum "intensive 3D clock", and a minimum "Aero/3D" clock.
Judge for yourself. He says it pretty much the way I did in this video at about the 1:00 mark. GeForce GTX 680 - GeForce
Basically they're saying they "USED to set their clocks based on the power consumed when you're running a really stressful application". Now they're doing a 180 and running higher clocks on "games that don't consume that much power".
I've seen the graphs from sites running benches and it results in stepped voltage and clocks that take your GPU on a completely unnecessary and unproductive roller coaster ride.
This is nothing but more hype in the gratuitous FPS bragging rights game, cannot be turned off, and does nothing to improve USABLE performance. Like I said, great performing card at a very reasonable and competitive price, but they totally lost my interest on the way GPU Boost is implemented.
It would be nice if someone can come up with a hack to turn GPU Boost off, or reverse the way it's used, but as is I can't see it impressing too many serious gamers. It's nothing but smoke and mirrors really.
I take what n0e says way too seriously
20th November 2007
Unfortunately smoke and mirrors and marketing buzzwords work far too well.