Is a Geforce 4 MX better then a orginal Geforce 4? 23 replies

Please wait...

Eagle One

:-D

50 XP

22nd December 2003

0 Uploads

2,992 Posts

0 Threads

#21 14 years ago

try and get a radeon 9600XT or a geforce 5700 ultra, they will do, unlike a geforce 4. Seriously though geforce 4s can play BFV on minimum graphics at 640x480 and i only used to get about 10fps. NOT good. So i bought a 9600xt 256mbs and i thought it was a great buy, i was very pleased overall. I could play FarCry on high graphics and water on very and i get 30-40 fps. So try and get one of them or better if u can




Xenomorph VIP Member

Validating my existance

50 XP

8th July 2002

0 Uploads

2,636 Posts

0 Threads

#22 14 years ago
PethegreatBest get a 8 pipeline card

Why stop at 8? nVidia's newest card has 16, and I believe ATI's X800 has 12. As for the MX series, they all suck in general, and perform noticeably worse than their non-MX counterparts. In fact, the GeForce 3 outperforms the GeForce 4 MX.




General Rommel

BF2 Files Staff

50 XP

25th October 2004

0 Uploads

2,822 Posts

0 Threads

#23 14 years ago

Oh jeez it does that means i should stay with the Geforce 3. rather then the MX cause all I want to play is Battlefield or Call of Duty. Maybe Doom 3 i havent gotten it yet. So a g force 3 is a better card then a g force 4 MX? Wow what a surprise I'am never getting Nvidia again they suck ballz. Also how much is the G force 5600 ultra?




General Rommel

BF2 Files Staff

50 XP

25th October 2004

0 Uploads

2,822 Posts

0 Threads

#24 14 years ago

Ok i asked my mom for me not to get the Nintendo DS for cristmas instead I'am going to get anything that performs 258mb can anyone tell me which one can do that. After some thoughts and such I like the ATI but i want one that is afforable and good. So tell me a ATI. The graphics card that is voted the most is what I will get.