Phenom II real-world benchmarks 17 replies

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

jjz-

Software Engineer

50 XP

16th October 2008

0 Uploads

511 Posts

0 Threads

#1 10 years ago

[H] Enthusiast - AMD Phenom II X4 Model 940 Black Edition Processor

I don't like or dislike AMD or intel. Here is a review done by hardocp, whom I respect very much.

Thoughts?




RadioactiveLobster Forum Admin

Jeff is a mean boss

566,057 XP

28th July 2002

0 Uploads

53,158 Posts

1,334 Threads

#2 10 years ago

In a nut shell their review of the new AMD Phenom II Black Edition is "Buy a Intel i7"


If there is no image, Mikey broke something...



Sgt. D. Pilla

Uber Geek

50 XP

23rd October 2007

0 Uploads

3,473 Posts

0 Threads

#3 10 years ago

Agreed, If I didn't read that properly I would have rushed out to buy an i7, But then i saw "640*480" as their testing resolution, thats a terrible way to test, their aiming for real world, yet going ancient world gaming resolutions to booster the AMD/Intel performance.

A bit biased if you ask me




RadioactiveLobster Forum Admin

Jeff is a mean boss

566,057 XP

28th July 2002

0 Uploads

53,158 Posts

1,334 Threads

#4 10 years ago

You obviously didn't read it. They test at those resolutions to remove any chance of a GPU bottleneck and put all the stress on the CPU.


If there is no image, Mikey broke something...



Oblivious

I tawt I taw a puddy tat...

50 XP

30th December 2002

0 Uploads

2,806 Posts

0 Threads

#5 10 years ago

That's just sad. Not only can the Phenom II not even remotely keep pace with the new i7's, it still gets crushed pretty handily by Intel's last generation Core2 quads. It's not really breaking news, but it's still sad.

People creating new builds still remain loyal to AMD because...? :confused: Help me out here.




jjz-

Software Engineer

50 XP

16th October 2008

0 Uploads

511 Posts

0 Threads

#6 10 years ago

The price of the AMD PII offering is appealing; however, their is truth that both chips can be overclocked a lot, and most people going for these enthusiast offerings are going to overclock.

It would be interesting to see a comparison of a 940 BE stock on a 920 core i7 stock, as they are in the same price range. I haven't googled for a benchmark like that; however, if someone has a link to one, make it available on this thread. The results will certainly be useful for many people considering a PII or I7.

Sgt, read through the review. They do a real-world gaming benchmark as well. at stock clocks and overclocked.




DarkKrucifix7

Geek on the Internets

50 XP

26th February 2007

0 Uploads

568 Posts

0 Threads

#7 10 years ago

Thing is, the tests were done with the AM2+ versions...perhaps performance will improve on the AM3 socket....




jjz-

Software Engineer

50 XP

16th October 2008

0 Uploads

511 Posts

0 Threads

#8 10 years ago

That would be interesting to see.




RadioactiveLobster Forum Admin

Jeff is a mean boss

566,057 XP

28th July 2002

0 Uploads

53,158 Posts

1,334 Threads

#9 10 years ago

These numbers are from "Tom's Hardware" so take them for what you will. A lot of people don't seem to like them for some reason.

A Core i7 920 @ 2.66 GHz is about 22% faster than a Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition A older Core2Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 GHz is about 9% slower than the Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition Performance Analysis: Core i7 920 and Core 2 Quad 6600 - Review Tom's Hardware : AMD Phenom II X4: 45nm Benchmarked


If there is no image, Mikey broke something...



jjz-

Software Engineer

50 XP

16th October 2008

0 Uploads

511 Posts

0 Threads

#10 10 years ago

That's not a very good sign in terms of price to performance.

But, it is still done on AM2+ instead of AM3. Is AM3's only difference over AM2+ the ability to use DDR3? Or is there something else. If it just lets it use DDR3 and doesn't add anything else into the equation, that will not make up for the performance lost.




  • 1
  • 2