Well the x1800xt is good for something! 5 replies

Please wait...

Pethegreat VIP Member

Lord of the Peach

70 XP

19th April 2004

0 Uploads

20,892 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

In an effort to speed up computations for research proposes academics and other scientific elites have turned to the processing power of graphics cards. GPUs may not hold the frequency speed records but they certainly have more math processing power than any single CPU today. Organizations such as www.GPGPU.org have devoted their efforts and resources to speed things up in the fields of physics simulations, medical imaging, speech recognition, and matrix/vector operations like Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Ray Tracing. It has been shown that the Intel Pentium 4 3.0 GHz processors can produce 12 GFLOPs / 5.96 GByte per second. Interestingly, by using graphics cards they can produce much higher throughput. The ATI X1800XT can produce almost 7 times as much throughput with 83 GFLOPs / 42 GByte per second. In a paper by Daniel Reiter Horn, Mike Houston, and Pat Hanrahan at Stanford University, they show results of CPUs as well as video cards using hidden Markov models (HMMs) to solve fuzzy protein sequence matching calculations. The paper states "...unlike the ATI hardware, the Nvdia hardware cannot directly use previous outputs as inputs for future iterations without a copy." ATI added features like write to memory that allow it to skip a copy step that was needed to move the calculations forward to the next step. This one addition is one of many in the GPU's arsenal. In the diagram below you can see where the efficiencies of the ATI X1800XT have even pushed its performance to a new level. It will be interesting to see where this science and academic community goes with ATI's new hardware (once it actually hits the market).

Source: http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/07/stanford_gpgpu/index.html

Well an x1800xt crunches numbers 7 times better than intel's p4.




Agentlaidlaw

Pie

50 XP

21st February 2005

0 Uploads

3,801 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

.......... Thats sad..........

Orlf!!!!!@




Pethegreat VIP Member

Lord of the Peach

70 XP

19th April 2004

0 Uploads

20,892 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

Actually it is amazing. You get better preformance than a dual core P4 system for only $550.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#4 13 years ago

Agentlaidlaw.......... Thats sad..........

Orlf!!!!!@

yes, but not supprising, at the least.




Dipship

Smarter than your average stump.

71 XP

26th June 2003

0 Uploads

26,967 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago

I've always wondered if the cpu's workload could be shared by the gpu when running programs that are not graphically intensive. Now I know. Hope this leads to some amazing new applications.


When in doubt, gas it!



Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#6 13 years ago

DipshipI've always wondered if the cpu's workload could be shared by the gpu when running programs that are not graphically intensive.

Now I know. Hope this leads to some amazing new applications.

you would also need some sort of new drivers and driver control. theoreticaly, its quite possible. good idea.