Windows Vista Requirements 12 replies

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

N88TR

Old school pimp

50 XP

10th February 2004

0 Uploads

9,921 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

[No word on WHICH version exactly. I suppose they all require the same stuff, but you get more "options" with the classier versions.]

A Tech Strategist within Microsoft, Nigel Page, has gone on record to discuss the hardware requirements for Windows Vista, due out next Christmas.

What he's said is kind of shocking.

System breakdown

Graphics: Vista has changed from using the CPU to display bitmaps on the screen to using the GPU to render vectors. This means the entire display model in Vista has changed. To render the screen in the GPU requires an awful lot of memory to do optimally - 256MB is a happy medium, but you'll actually see benefit from more. Microsoft believes that you're going to see the amount of video memory being shipped on cards hurtle up when Vista ships.

CPU: Threading is the main target for Vista. Currently, very little of Windows XP is threaded - the target is to make Vista perform far better on dual-core and multi-core processors.

RAM: 2GB is the ideal configuration for 64-bit Vista, we're told. Vista 32-bit will work ideally at 1GB, and minimum 512. However, since 64-bit is handling data chunks that are double the size, you'll need double the memory, hence the 2GB. Nigel mentions DDR3 - which is a little odd, since the roadmap for DDR3, on Intel gear at least, doesn't really kick in until 2007.

HDD: SATA is definitely the way forward for Vista, due, Microsoft tells us, to Native Command Queueing. NCQ allows for out of order completions - that is, if Vista needs tasks 1,2,3,4 and 5 done, it can do them in the order 2,5,3,4,1 if that's a more efficient route for the hard drive head to take over the disk. This leads to far faster completion times. NCQ is supported on SATA2 drives, so expect them to start becoming the standard sooner rather than later. Microsoft thinks that these features will provide SCSI-level performance.

Bus: AGP is 'not optimal' for Vista. Because of the fact that graphics cards may have to utilise main system memory for some rendering tasks, a fast, bi-direction bus is needed - that's PCI express.

Display: Prepare to feel the red mist of rage - no current TFT monitor out there is going to support high definition playback in Vista. You may already have heard rumblings about this, but here it is. To play HD-DVD or Blu-Ray content you need a HDCP compatible monitor. Why? Because these formats use HDCP to encrypt a video signal as it travels along a digital connection to an output device, to prevent people copying it. If you have just standard DVI or even an analogue output, you're going to see HD scaled down to a far-less-than-HD resolution for viewing - which sucks. This isn't really Microsoft's fault - HDCP is something that content makers, in their eternal wisdom, have decided is necessary to stop us all watching pirated movies. Yay.

My speech: Unless games require the OS in the future I'm not buying it. MULTICORES?! 2 GIG RAM?! ARE THEY INSANE?! WTF IS IN THEIR PEA BRAINS?! The OS should be the middle to least system hungry application. My god! I'll take performance over transparency and angled windows ANY DAY!




Agentlaidlaw

Pie

50 XP

21st February 2005

0 Uploads

3,801 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

Wasnt there another post in here talking about the same thing?




N88TR

Old school pimp

50 XP

10th February 2004

0 Uploads

9,921 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

I don't think so. I made mine first, I think




Eagle One

:-D

50 XP

22nd December 2003

0 Uploads

2,992 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago

hmm, i think i recall a thread about the same thing aswell, but like quite a while ago, when the name 'Windows Vista' was first announced, the requirements came out not so long after if i remember correctly and there was a thread about them ... right?




Kilobyte

What does the Fox say?

69,060 XP

23rd November 2002

0 Uploads

6,468 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago

Yeah, this is last month's news.

Its buried a couple pages deep now. Due to all of Captain Amerika's, and Agentlaidlaw's threads. Especially Agents. How many is that now? :eek: I think you have more threads in this forum, than I do.




RadioactiveLobster Forum Admin

Jeff is a mean boss

565,400 XP

28th July 2002

0 Uploads

53,121 Posts

1,330 Threads

#6 13 years ago

i remember that thread....it does exist....somewhere on the forums, anyway.... there are games with less req than that


If there is no image, Mikey broke something...



AegenemmnoN VIP Member

The cream of the crop

228,590 XP

19th August 2003

0 Uploads

21,534 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago

fat chance ill be buying Vista in the next year to year and a half.

by next year those items will be cheaper, though i doubt i shall want Vista since i have had no problems with XP.




Rookie VIP Member

128,030 XP

3rd May 2005

0 Uploads

11,953 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago

Vista is just insane. I'm not even considering moving to it.




Dragokatzov

GF is my bext friend *hugs GF*

50 XP

24th January 2005

0 Uploads

1,363 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago

Lets take into consideration that vista is still more than a year away, by then, pcs with 2 gigs of ram is going to be very common....




Agentlaidlaw

Pie

50 XP

21st February 2005

0 Uploads

3,801 Posts

0 Threads

#10 13 years ago
Monster_userYeah, this is last month's news. Its buried a couple pages deep now. Due to all of Captain Amerika's, and Agentlaidlaw's threads. Especially Agents. How many is that now? :eek: I think you have more threads in this forum, than I do.

I can't stop posting :( please help lol.




  • 1
  • 2