Darth Revan vs. Starkiller -1 reply

Please wait...

Razgriz1928

Strength Through Progress

50 XP

26th October 2007

0 Uploads

1,694 Posts

0 Threads

#1 10 years ago

Now some people may consider this topic ridiculous, and I may even recieve some flack for it, but I think it as an interesting topic.:D A clash of two powerful video game characters that people share many different views on. If they were to meet in combat who do you think would win?




G.R.A.E.M.E. VIP Member

No-Life Overwatch Player

178,803 XP

14th August 2008

0 Uploads

15,861 Posts

0 Threads

#2 10 years ago

This is an interesting topic indeed. Finally someone who creates a poll without comparing Game characters and Movie characters.

I'd go for Starkiller, as he's one of the most powerful force users. However, Revan is one of the most powerful Sith Lords ever. A tough choice, but I'll stick to Starkiller.


Formerly known as Graeme and Arld.



Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#3 10 years ago

it's a good thread

However it's a tough decision and I'm not going to vote JUSt yet They are both game characters so their powers and dangerously exagerated to make it sell

Personally I refuse to see some of Starkillers work as cannon such as forming the rebels and revan's as he left to the unknown regions and the cheap bastards didn't tell us what happened but led us to belive he died due to the Ebon hawk and droids returning.




johann2303

GF makes me horny

50 XP

23rd October 2007

0 Uploads

93 Posts

0 Threads

#4 10 years ago

Okey some facts: Starkiller had the potential to be the most powerfull Force-user in history, but he never became that powerfull. As for Revan: Who the hell said that Revan was amongst the most powerfull Sith Lords?




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#5 10 years ago
johann2303;4692938Okey some facts: Starkiller had the potential to be the most powerfull Force-user in history, but he never became that powerfull. As for Revan: Who the hell said that Revan was amongst the most powerfull Sith Lords?

revan most powerful? well I have chose neither of them as in my eyes they were both pawns of the Sith. Starkiller had the potential but epically failed and of course was a game character so had to be shown that powerfull. Revan was powerfull"like staring into the heart of the force" said kreia/traya however he was a persuader he used other people to fight,I'm not saying he was weak not at all but he was a leader.




Speer

GF's Cheerios Expert

50 XP

16th January 2008

0 Uploads

2,082 Posts

0 Threads

#6 10 years ago

Revan was probably the best leader out there, either him, or Sidious. However Starkiller had more potential which he never developed.

I would say that Revan was probably the better Sith.




Razgriz1928

Strength Through Progress

50 XP

26th October 2007

0 Uploads

1,694 Posts

0 Threads

#7 10 years ago
Speer;4693927Revan was probably the best leader out there, either him, or Sidious. However Starkiller had more potential which he never developed. I would say that Revan was probably the better Sith.

Yes but remember, Starkiller wasn't a Sith at the end:D. But who would win in a duel? I think it would be difficult to decide but if Starkiller had survived...who would know?




johann2303

GF makes me horny

50 XP

23rd October 2007

0 Uploads

93 Posts

0 Threads

#8 10 years ago

If Starkiller had survived and reached his full potential, then there's not a single shred of doubt in my mind that Starkiller would be the victor . But we are talking at-time-of-death right? In that case... who knows? There's just no way to compare the two, without refering to game mechanics, which is not canon and are fraud upon around here. But personally: I'd say Starkiller.




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#9 10 years ago
johann2303;4694599If Starkiller had survived and reached his full potential, then there's not a single shred of doubt in my mind that Starkiller would be the victor . But we are talking at-time-of-death right? In that case... who knows? There's just no way to compare the two, without refering to game mechanics, which is not canon and are fraud upon around here. But personally: I'd say Starkiller.

Full potential?

revan killed Marka ragnos....he defeated darth Malak, mandolore the great Starkiller was strong,very strong however most of his accomplishments weren't all that amazing. Also revan found the starforge THEN attacked it AGAIN.

I myself find them equal. They both had unbelievable potential AND we don't know exactly what happened to Revan in the unknown regions. Perhaps he didn't need the Ebon Hawk because he could travel through the force?Who cares as far as we know he either died or killed the 'true sith'




Ki Adi Mundi VIP Member

Knight of MarsBeater of Ass

51,517 XP

3rd June 2006

1 Uploads

4,649 Posts

199 Threads

#10 10 years ago

Why is this even here? Why does this thread exist? It's not even a question- Starkiller would OWN Revan, hands down.

Revan, at best, is a mediocre force user. Ambushed by a handful of jedi? Are you kidding me? I don't see why people are so obsessed with him/her. Starkiller, on the other hand, pulls down capitol class ships. His command of the Force is much more developed, as well as his skills with a lightsaber.