The Venator Mess up? -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

NCC1017spock

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

25th April 2007

0 Uploads

3,558 Posts

0 Threads

#1 10 years ago

Well I dont know if any one alse has foudn this but look here and tell me whats wrong: (hint - look where is says complement on the right hand side) Venator-class Star Destroyer - Wookieepedia, the Star Wars Wiki Well, 192 V-wings, ok thats cool. Next 36 ARC-170's, thats cool to....but wait! What is this? 192 ETA-2 atics interceptors? My question is why do they carry 192 jedi star fighters on each ship? (this same thing is said in all the books as well)




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#2 10 years ago

well if you look at the page of the ETA_2 atics interceptors it says that they wree nicknamed jedi starfighters as they were POPUKAR with jedi's so not just jedi's used them sorry to bring up a game...but in star wars battlefront 2 that kinda shows you




NCC1017spock

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

25th April 2007

0 Uploads

3,558 Posts

0 Threads

#3 10 years ago

oh, ok.....but (not in game) I have never seen a non-jedi use one, in movies, comics, books, or TV shows. So ya I guess that makes sense, I would assume the stanard use ones would look like Obi-wans fighter? ( the red color sceem for the republic? )




Stark98

I would die without GF

138,935 XP

25th March 2005

0 Uploads

13,416 Posts

0 Threads

#4 10 years ago

the thing that they screw up in my opinion is the length. They say its more than 1137m but when i saw the ship ascending of coruscant, they looked more like 850 a max 990m.




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#5 10 years ago
Porschatron Prime;4390243the thing that they screw up in my opinion is the length. They say its more than 1137m but when i saw the ship ascending of coruscant, they looked more like 850 a max 990m.

i think the length looked about right

and about the color of them well they were usually yellow with some blue and others(like in star wars starfighter 2,if you ever played it:cool:)and when plo-koon dies in epi 3 he is in one i belive the red ones like obi-wans were usually unique as some jedi's chose their own colors usually the standard was grey with some blue




NCC1017spock

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

25th April 2007

0 Uploads

3,558 Posts

0 Threads

#6 10 years ago

I know what your talking about, personally I like the ones with grey and Republic red on them, like obi-wans star fighter. IDK I am an old republic fan...




Stark98

I would die without GF

138,935 XP

25th March 2005

0 Uploads

13,416 Posts

0 Threads

#7 10 years ago

i like the smell of burned jedi fighters.




Granyaski VIP Member

High as a kite

107 XP

29th May 2008

0 Uploads

11,881 Posts

1 Threads

#8 10 years ago

^^^ WTF!lol here is a good question about ships does anyone actually like tie fighters compared to snow speeders and x-wings?




Stark98

I would die without GF

138,935 XP

25th March 2005

0 Uploads

13,416 Posts

0 Threads

#9 10 years ago

like? snowspeeders are no match for tie fighters or xwings.. Tiefighters are a cheap fighter, tie interceptors ftw!




Fyurii

NEKRON!!!!!!!

50 XP

4th August 2006

0 Uploads

3,477 Posts

0 Threads

#10 10 years ago
Porschatron Prime;4390540like? snowspeeders are no match for tie fighters or xwings.. Tiefighters are a cheap fighter, tie interceptors ftw!

They may be cheap, but their manoeuvring and agility was better than an X-Wing's. They just didn't have shields or a Hyperdrive.

As for the Venator, I honestly don't think that it matches the capacity it's supposed to carry, based on its scale in the films. I'm not just talking length, but breadth and depth.

The main body of the ship doesn't seem deep enough, nor does it seem wide enough. Length wise, maybe...... maybe.....




  • 1
  • 2