Yes -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

carpanther

Overweight Soldier

50 XP

20th May 2003

0 Uploads

1,129 Posts

0 Threads

#1 16 years ago

I got a Radeon 9500 2 day!!! :) :) :) :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :smokin: :rock: :rock: :rock: :fistpunch: :naughty: :lookaround:




embrel23

Just here.

50 XP

18th March 2003

0 Uploads

103 Posts

0 Threads

#2 16 years ago

I got a radeon 9700 Pro two months ago.

But, welcome to the wonderful world of dazzling displays!




carpanther

Overweight Soldier

50 XP

20th May 2003

0 Uploads

1,129 Posts

0 Threads

#3 16 years ago

Originally posted by embrel23 I got a radeon 9700 Pro two months ago. But, welcome to the wonderful world of dazzling displays!

Ty i love ATIs




LedZep

ZoSo Freak

50 XP

11th November 2002

0 Uploads

632 Posts

0 Threads

#4 16 years ago

I bought an ATI Radeon 9500 Pro about umm a month ago. I upgraded from my ATI 128 Rage Fury Pro, love the card :agreed:

:cya:




Dr.H8

mmmmmm......beeeer!

50 XP

6th September 2002

0 Uploads

411 Posts

0 Threads

#5 16 years ago

i cant help noticing that most people here have ati radeon cards are they much better than geforce ti cards?




VonStriker

The Internet ends at GF

50 XP

5th March 2003

0 Uploads

109 Posts

0 Threads

#6 16 years ago

Well.... according to ATI owners..... they are. I think it's all prefrence, such as pentium or "That Other Chip"... hehehe. I prefer Nvidia only because of their history to keep the drivers updated. ATI has had a poor history on that part. Nvidia has more OEM manufacturers than ATI , so offers more variables on prices and perks. I mean, how many Companys make ATI based cards? It's all personal prefrence.




carpanther

Overweight Soldier

50 XP

20th May 2003

0 Uploads

1,129 Posts

0 Threads

#7 16 years ago
Originally posted by Dr.H8 i cant help noticing that most people here have ati radeon cards are they much better than geforce ti cards?

ATI VS Nividia stats

ATI Speed:75% Texture quality:99.9% Overall:95%

Nividia Speed:99.9% Texture quality:40% Overall:80%

thats my take.:agreed:




Vanthem

Medic With A Baseball Bat

50 XP

10th August 2002

0 Uploads

2,151 Posts

0 Threads

#8 16 years ago

[COLOR=burlywood]I think the ATI speed, at least in recent times, would be a bit higher than 75 percent. But that's just me. :D

I prefer Nvidia only because of their history to keep the drivers updated. ATI has had a poor history on that part.

I always hear this, but it's never been my experience. I've had an All In Wonder Radeon (32 meg), then a GeForce3 Ti 200, and then a 9700 Pro. With ATI, I've never had a problem with drivers, updates, or the frequency of their releases. My GeForce3 was rarely anything but a headache and I ran into a few relatively minor annoyances with nvidia's drivers. In my view, the ATI/problem-driver claim is an argument based off the old ATI cards and the old video card wars frame of thought, having little to do with the actual performance of ATI's newer cards and drivers. [/color]




owens

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

6th April 2003

0 Uploads

13 Posts

0 Threads

#9 16 years ago

ATI used to be fairly mediocre with drivers but in the last couple of years they have proben themselves capable of making great drivers. Although not yet at an nvidia level I'd say that ATI has definately made significant advances.




bf1942blasta

Addicted to GF

50 XP

17th March 2003

0 Uploads

271 Posts

0 Threads

#10 16 years ago

congrats on your radeon 9700.I'm still stuck with my Geforce 2 mx 400 64 mb.:( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :mad: :mad: :mad: :fistpunch: :fistpunch: :fistpunch: :fistpunch:

well It ain't too bad,works like a charm.I'm happywith it,but I'ts nothing compared to a geforce 4 or readeon 9700.




  • 1
  • 2