A heterosexual view of homophobia 91 replies

Please wait...

Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#21 16 years ago

They're not just great, they're probably where many many gangs stem from; to make it worse schools don't really stop it, after all it's just "children being children!"...so much for seeing the bigger picture.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#22 16 years ago

Being a homo is unnatural. You need a pussy and a penis to produce. Shafting anus will not further the advancement of the Human Race, it will kill it. I read somewhere some bullshit about it being genetic. I don't buy that for a second. If it is, it's a genetic disorder.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#23 16 years ago

Damn this isn't the melee, I want to tell you where to shove a view like that....talk about narrow minded and it's not just "I don't like homosexuality" oh no it's full blown insultive talk!

And we've covered that stupid idea of sex being purely for procreation many times, try reading for once instead of being so, to put it mildly, moronic. Try reading zer0sums very brief argument against that a few posts up then go bask in your narrow minded view of the world.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#24 16 years ago

I don't care for his posts, so I'll decline. Thanks. Feel free to tell me whatever you wish. Your opinion matters not. I have a point and I believe in what I have to say. If you don't like it, if it makes you angry to read an alternative point of view, then you shouldn't be here.

The purpose of life is procreation. Yeah, pass on your genetic code and further your family line to ensure the survival of the species. If you can present for me a valid argument as to why this is wrong, then I'm ready to listen. I am not narrow minded, you are so blinded by your utter reliance on "I am gay, and proud" that you fail to see someone elses point of view. I have read your posts with interest and I'm sure that as a person you are a nice enough guy. But what you choose to do sexually is against human nature. Without insulting you directly, for that is not my intention, homosexual copulation is just plain wrong. My ass was not designed for your dick. How fucking difficult is that to understand? If every person on this planet was a queer, we'd have very few years left.

As for the "stupid idea of sex being purely for procreation", it isn't a stupid idea. Of course pleasure is gained from acts of a carnal nature, but the purpose of intercourse is procreation. You cannot deny that without looking like a fool.

(As for your comment on the now defunct Melee, it doesn't exist, so state your opinion in a manner without resorting to childish name calling. If that is at all possible.)




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#25 16 years ago

Fine let me make this simple enough for you to understand...the purpose of life is to live, it is NOT to reproduce, reproduction does indeed continue the human race but no where does it say we must have sex to create a child!

People wear condoms, people get sterilised, people don't have sex - monks, totally religious but don't continue the human race - argue against THAT. Honestly, like I said, narrow minded.

We have foreplay, we have sexual acts that require no sex...the fact is sex is NOT just for procreation.

Stop being so bloody stupid and thinking sex must be to reproduce, it isn't. It's there if you want to reproduce, there is no law that says that must happen! If every time someone had sex a child was made just imagine the population problems.




AzH

I'm too cool to Post

269,650 XP

17th September 2003

0 Uploads

24,050 Posts

0 Threads

#26 16 years ago

i'd have to disagree. if the purpose of life was just to live we'd all be dead. procreation is what drives the species forward.




pInK_eLePhAnT

x|anywhere||but||here|x

50 XP

7th December 2003

0 Uploads

2,748 Posts

0 Threads

#27 16 years ago
j0n d0eit will kill it. I read somewhere some bullshit about it being genetic. I don't buy that for a second. If it is, it's a genetic disorder.

being homosexual isn't passed on to you by your parents, however scientists are fairly sure it is wired into your genes. so yes, it probably is a genetic disorder, but so what? there are lots of other people who are born with genetic disorders, and we don't say they are wrong. for the most part, these people are accepted. so should not gays and lesbians also be accepted?




Trojan_Ripper

Waiting on the change

50 XP

2nd April 2003

0 Uploads

1,249 Posts

0 Threads

#28 16 years ago

zer0sumIf you are refering to my post then I'd need 'a little clarification' as to what you'd, 'like a little clarification' over. If you really care for me to expand on it in the first place: Point 1 It's a relief & elucidating to see all the damning & portents of a dumbed down & defunct unthinking society rebuked even in the most unlikely of forums. As say this, as I mentioned in the post I don't think that this was ever seen as the primary function of this forum & yet the poster is apologising for adding to a line of debate which has seen, 'more than enough threads'. I say that humans are perverse because I am certain most people on this forum do not frequent political/philiosophical discussion forums where this thread may be evidently seen as more 'on topic'. & yet people (which involves primarily 'young' people on this forum allegedly) will give time & thought to these issues. The net gets alot of bad press as regards its impact on society - you will of course never see a headline 'Net enables & encourages the discussion of pressing social & political issues & opinion', but its great to see it happen & develop with your own eyes. 2. My second point primarily involves something entirely different & more general though its still a 'social topic' in that when you stop & think the real significance of what networking all the computers together has given rise to in terms of possibilities it is really mind-boggling. Its already stagnant as any other cliche to claim that people really are only seeing the tip of the iceberg, (& cannot really fathom the implications of the magnitude & depth of the rest of that 'glacier') when it comes to the effects that having 24hr access to the net & its 'services' will have in totally on the world as a whole; however I still think its real impact is still greatly underestimated by the majority. I also think that surprisingly you find people who understand the technical aspects (of the net & its function) to a high level, are part of that majority. Point 3 Disecting what is in fact happening here - the low level process that is leaving an imprint on this site - I would make a bold conjecture that since any physical attribute I possess is not being transmitted or recorded (excluding the fact that I am typing this) then what is being brought into play & existance in this net 'realm' is only to do with intellect. I propose this is the case with anyone using the net in this way. Reading information acting on it & inviting other humans to comment on it irrespective of their location (language permitting). Our intellects have found a place (or plane if you want to be romantic about it) on which to meet as equals. Point 4 Its comical & ironic to have people who will while away hours in front of a television pass judgment on those who spend (significant) time online when the criticism tends to involve such things as lack of participation, social contact, awareness, cerebral & intellectual stagnation etc. Going off at a tangent ( admittedly again)... Having said that every blue moon television networks (perhaps only in the UK - I do not watch any other tv) do air some outstanding & salutory programmes, you have to keep an eagle eye on the schedules so as not to miss them though. Don't get me wrong I don't argue that entertainment is inferior or not as worthy, but the ratio of entertainment to life-addressing, thought-provoking tv is not what it should be. Great entertainment can also encompass thought-provoking & life-addressing 'issues' or drama. This is generally harder to produce however & when done badly it will only compromise the dual function of the work. But I think alot of truly great entertainment manages to introduce many things on several levels in harmony for at least some of its duration. I do not claim to have any type of media qualification, just conjecture.

Ok. Fork time - I'm done. *Hands out metaphorical rifles to the gathered to shoot him down for being pretentious*

Could you please clarify that clarification?




AzH

I'm too cool to Post

269,650 XP

17th September 2003

0 Uploads

24,050 Posts

0 Threads

#29 16 years ago

clarification. the net is good for examining social and cultural issues despite what the world might think.

oh, and TV sucks.

so does school.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#30 16 years ago

"procreation is what drives the species forward." no no, procreation is what continues life...done in moderation, when you are born you are never REQUIRED to procreate. It's an optional part of life for us all, the only time anyone feels like they need a child is if they get that urge to be a parent and not everyone does... many many people never have a child, by your definition of life being to pro-create, these people are odd too.