Sedistix;3861765Comparing the choice of whether or not a woman does with her body as she chooses, regardless of potentials lives she may or might not bring into this world, with the analogy of nuclear weapons, or invalids who can not murder, isn’t a valid argument. Considering the present day legality of abortion it goes to say that is the consensus.[/QUOTE]
Considering the past legality of murdering Jews it goes to say that at one point that was the consensus in Germany. Appealing to the greater number of people isn't a valid argument, consensus changes.
[QUOTE=Sedistix;3861765]You can derail this into any sideways analogies you like. Wont change much.
You can continue to state your opinion without sufficient logical reasoning or evidence to back yourself up. But I'd really rather you didn't.
Nemmerle;3861792Considering the past legality of murdering Jews it goes to say that at one point that was the consensus in Germany. Appealing to the greater number of people isn't a valid argument, consensus changes.[/quote]
Goodwin's Law of Usenet is in no short supply here. [quote=Nemmerle;3861792]You can continue to state your opinion without sufficient logical reasoning or evidence to back yourself up. But I'd really rather you didn't. The phrase “sufficient logical reasoning” coming from someone who just tried to “straw man” their way through a discussion is rather humorous. I havent laughed all day, thanks ;) I've already stated my 'logical' opinions earlier. So, as for this ad hominem discussion among males about what females can or can not do with their bodies, i'll leave you to it.