Bush bans CIA torture 23 replies

Please wait...

masked_marsoe VIP Member

Heaven's gonna burn your eyes

50 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

8,063 Posts

0 Threads

#1 11 years ago

Al Jazeera English - News - Bush Bans Cia Suspect Torture

George Bush, the US president, has signed an executive order forbidding the CIA to torture, humiliate or abuse suspected terrorists in its once-secret interrogation program.

Jennifer Daskal, a senior counter-terrorism counsel with Human Rights Watch, said: "The key aspect of this is all the parts that aren't said."

Daskal said that the order allowed "a system of incommunicado detention to continue, with the blessing of the president.

While it's good that there is some recognition of this problem, and this is a small step towards rectifying that, that torture has existed is not acceptable.




The-Bleh-Bleh

Hasselhoff is my hero

50 XP

12th December 2006

0 Uploads

6,189 Posts

0 Threads

#2 11 years ago

Ah... I didn't know there was stuff like that going on, but I'm not surprised... At least it's being stopped I suppose.




Karst

I chose an eternity of this

50 XP

6th January 2005

0 Uploads

4,505 Posts

0 Threads

#3 11 years ago

An important step but unfortunately the new guidelines they set up themselves are sort of vague. Not to mention the CIA will just haul prisoners to Egypt or something so they can be tortured outside of national law.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#4 11 years ago

Sadly Karst this is true. Just because the President has issued an executive order forbidding them to torture, doesnt mean they won't still do it and just Cut him out of the loop. But if torturing 1 man and gaining a vital piece of information saved millions of lives woulod it be worth it. Its the Numbers Game.




Octovon

Spaceman

54,945 XP

5th August 2003

0 Uploads

5,317 Posts

0 Threads

#5 11 years ago

Yea, read about this in the morning paper. Problem was, the paper itself pushes a strong anti-Iraq, something of an anti-Bush, and an even lesser anti-US bias, and the story was confined to the smallest part of the last page, and without anything but that headline making the entire article pretty much. I think its still a good thing, that Bush will admit that there's something of a problem (among others) and that he is not willing to take some shortcuts in human rights (among others) in order to maintain national security.




colonel_bob

Here & There

50 XP

4th June 2004

0 Uploads

6,685 Posts

0 Threads

#6 11 years ago
The-Bleh-Bleh;3808964Ah... I didn't know there was stuff like that going on, but I'm not surprised... At least it's being stopped I suppose.

By no means is an executive order going to stop it. Maybe cut down on it, sure, but not eliminate it. The main benefit of this is that it shows we "officially" don't condone torture.




Dot Com

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

26th June 2000

0 Uploads

6,116 Posts

0 Threads

#7 11 years ago

I doubt this will actually be enforced. It seems to be just a PR move to get torture skeptics off of his back...




Cyber-Raptor

Evil Raptor

50 XP

13th May 2005

0 Uploads

215 Posts

0 Threads

#8 11 years ago

Why shouldn't they be tortured? They're terrorists and illegal enemy combatants. If the shitbags have information, it should be beaten out of them. Besides, it's not as if they wouldn't do the same thing to any of their captives.




Badha1rday

Nature's best screw up.

132,255 XP

27th July 2005

0 Uploads

12,663 Posts

0 Threads

#9 11 years ago

OMG...... Bush did something smart!

Yea...but really, Good decision on his part. Turture is very wrong, even if we use it on enemies, torture sucks. We have to use other means to get info, not hurt them until they tell us.




Cyber-Raptor

Evil Raptor

50 XP

13th May 2005

0 Uploads

215 Posts

0 Threads

#10 11 years ago

What other means of extracting information is there with those people? They understand one thing: Violence.