Bush Teleconference With Soldiers Staged 35 replies

Please wait...

Psychokenesis

I'm too cool to Post

136,505 XP

16th October 2003

0 Uploads

13,428 Posts

0 Threads

#11 14 years ago

I thought it was funny when the reporter was asking if the confrence set up the military official never answered the question...

rather he asked back...was she suggesting that the president of the United States was anything but honest....

I would've said..."I believe that what the question implies."




Komrad_B

Score Monkey

45,850 XP

2nd September 2004

0 Uploads

4,500 Posts

0 Threads

#12 14 years ago
ObliviousWell if Al Qaeda denied it, then we should definately believe them. They are so well known for being men of honor and trustworthy. :uhm:

While this might sound stupid, we should belive them since they are always proud to admit it when they've done something bad.




Mastershroom VIP Member

Frag Out!

153,685 XP

18th November 2004

0 Uploads

14,196 Posts

0 Threads

#13 14 years ago

Komrad makes a point, they generally boast their "accomplishments" shamelessly.




Blood n Guts

Wolverine Starting 9/6/2006

50 XP

22nd March 2005

0 Uploads

758 Posts

0 Threads

#14 14 years ago

I'm not exactly sure if a letter paritally detailing strategic plans is an accomplishment. As far as Al Queda's statment goes, who the hell knows? They could just as easily be lieing to hide their true plans as be telling the truth in order to cast doubt on the word of the US. Back on topic: @ Bresilin, there was an informal survey last year prior to the election which showed that the troops favored Bush 4 to 1. It wasn't a very scientific survey, and there are no parallel surveys to compare it so it is anything but concrete evidense; however, if true, it does confirm that the traditionally republican army voting army agrees with Bush;at the very least to an extent slightly greater than his rivals.




Seth_Soldier

"Mort aux cons !"

50 XP

23rd December 2003

0 Uploads

883 Posts

0 Threads

#15 14 years ago
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie

ok i stop there. it's really insane. I've seen that only 2% of the black community is still supporting bush and it's the first time that popularity of bush is under 40% of the us population.




GreatGrizzly

Fear the Bear

50 XP

23rd February 2005

0 Uploads

1,622 Posts

0 Threads

#16 14 years ago
Lt. Comm BreslinYes, they were fully aware of the situation they were going into...I'm sure they were expecting an American death toll of 1965 and a total wounded count of 14755..[/quote] no, they were expecting no death toll, because the iraqis will greet them all with open arms :rolleyes:
Lt. Comm BreslinI remember them saying that this war would run on for several years [/quote] it has run on for years
Lt. Comm Breslinand that there would still be no Iraqi constitution even to this day.
and there isnt, because they cant agree on one [quote=Lt. Comm Breslin]I remember them saying that there would be massive resistance to the American presense.
around 2000 killed and 14755 wounded, what do you call that? [quote=Lt. Comm Breslin]I even remember them saying that British troops would mount offensives against the 'new' Iraqi police force.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4262336.stm they have




Red Menace

SCHOFIELD DID 4/30

415,760 XP

10th August 2004

0 Uploads

40,364 Posts

1 Threads

#17 14 years ago

I think he was being sarcastic.


sigpic82523_3.gif</div></body></html>



CHAKA VIP Member

Anti-antidisestablishmentarian

50 XP

15th January 2004

0 Uploads

5,038 Posts

0 Threads

#18 14 years ago

GreatGrizzlyno, they were expecting no death toll, because the iraqis will greet them all with open arms :rolleyes: it has run on for years and there isnt, because they cant agree on one around 2000 killed and 14755 wounded, what do you call that?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4262336.stm they have

You aren't very good at this sort of thing, are you...




Mihail VIP Member

President of Novistrana

50 XP

19th January 2003

0 Uploads

15,509 Posts

0 Threads

#19 14 years ago

Of course it was staged, otherwise they would be asking why the fuck are they still there?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#20 14 years ago

Yes, I agree. Most Americans don't support this war. Only the blind and dillusional still do. There was no real justification for it in the first place. A pointless war.