Gay Marriage? 48 replies

Please wait...

pInK_eLePhAnT

x|anywhere||but||here|x

50 XP

7th December 2003

0 Uploads

2,748 Posts

0 Threads

#21 16 years ago

also, married couples get more benefits.




Zab

BROtastic

50 XP

30th March 2003

0 Uploads

8,186 Posts

0 Threads

#22 16 years ago

Well, personally, I believe it's their business, and well, what right do I have to meddle in it? I don't. It's better that we just let them marry; it makes no difference if they're married or not. They are the same people, married or not.

As long as it's not shown off (as LordWiener talked about), or shoved in my face, I don't care. We're making too much fuss about it anyways..




evildude

I take what n0e says way too seriously

50 XP

25th August 2003

0 Uploads

4,300 Posts

0 Threads

#23 16 years ago

I think they should do what they went it's there lives so don't get in there way.




TheMirage

The People's Politsayski

50 XP

25th January 2004

0 Uploads

6,624 Posts

0 Threads

#24 16 years ago
yod@who cares about other people like to do, their life their choice

yeah, if they want to wind up in hell, fine. <-------Sarcasm Gay marraige is wrong, and it completely degraeds the meaning and purpose of marraige. Like Mihail said, in the bible it says "one man, one woman" not "two men"




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#25 16 years ago

Yes, gay marriage is degrading to the true meaning. Like I said, marriage has a VERY extensive history. To change the definition because some people want to be differant is not right.

However, I fully support civil unions. They get the same rights as married couples, and are recognized as couples. They are just not recognized as married.




ScOrPY Advanced Member

Advanced Member

50 XP

17th November 2003

0 Uploads

15,582 Posts

0 Threads

#26 16 years ago

Yeah im pretty much agreeing what is being said here, im all for it, but marriage between a man and woman is the true meaning




yod@

I'm way cooler than n0e (who isn't though?)

50 XP

14th April 2004

0 Uploads

4,898 Posts

0 Threads

#27 16 years ago

i read in a newspaper that viacom and mtv are overseeing a gay t.v channel what will be telecasted in that channel, gay sex!!!




Sgt_Dude

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

19th November 2003

0 Uploads

1,025 Posts

0 Threads

#28 16 years ago
However, I fully support civil unions. They get the same rights as married couples, and are recognized as couples. They are just not recognized as married.

That's my take on it. No argument will change my mind on the subject. kthx




Admiral Donutz Advanced Member

Wanna go Double Dutch?

735,271 XP

9th December 2003

0 Uploads

71,460 Posts

0 Threads

#29 16 years ago
yod@i read in a newspaper that viacom and mtv are overseeing a gay t.v channel what will be telecasted in that channel, gay sex!!!

Well aslong as they don't show it on any regular tv channel and at midnight i don't have a problem with that, IMO its just s wrong/good as broadcasting hetrosex. If hetrosex on tv is ok then why should't gay sex on tv be ok?




Sgt_Dude

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

19th November 2003

0 Uploads

1,025 Posts

0 Threads

#30 16 years ago

I wouldn't mind a pay service gay TV channel, they have playboy, why not gheyboi? lol

I dont see the demographic watching it though. Maybe, don't know.

But yeah, it's no better/worse than hetero sex on TV, which doesn't belong on NBC or ABC.