Genocide Now! Genocide Now! 122 replies

Please wait...

StickAvalancheman

Secksy

50 XP

10th April 2006

0 Uploads

351 Posts

0 Threads

#1 12 years ago

http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues...re1p/index.html Gotta love when the scientific community applauds a fucking maniac. smile.gif




LIGHTNING [NL]

FH2 Developer

50 XP

30th May 2003

0 Uploads

9,811 Posts

0 Threads

#2 12 years ago

That's cool. I've wanted to be a mad scientist since I was a little.




Young_Pioneer

Capitalize THIS!

50 XP

18th April 2006

0 Uploads

547 Posts

0 Threads

#3 12 years ago

The Black Death of the 14th century killed one third of the European population, but it was one reason for the reformation of Europe's social structure and finally lead to the Renaissance.

A natural pandemic killing 90% of the world's population could restore the ecological balance, change the political systems and ultimately help mankind to survive as a species.

But who wants to belong to the 90%?




Delta Force

Revenge was here.

50 XP

23rd June 2005

0 Uploads

1,622 Posts

0 Threads

#4 12 years ago

Overpopulation needs to be solved but not by killing off people. Besides, where would you bury all those people, and who the hell would carry out genocide? Maybee this guy should go talk to Iran, they have a lot in common.




Young_Pioneer

Capitalize THIS!

50 XP

18th April 2006

0 Uploads

547 Posts

0 Threads

#5 12 years ago

Where did he say that it should be started by humans?

He just discussed a hypothetical scenario caused by a natural pandemic. And the "positive" result (eliminating overpopulation and saving Earth's resources). Of course, it is misanthropic and cynic, but he is right.




Delta Force

Revenge was here.

50 XP

23rd June 2005

0 Uploads

1,622 Posts

0 Threads

#6 12 years ago

Young_PioneerWhere did he say that it should be started by humans?

He just discussed a hypothetical scenario caused by a natural pandemic. And the "positive" result (eliminating overpopulation and saving Earth's resources). Of course, it is misanthropic and cynic, but he is right.

I sure as hell hope that's what he meant. But if their is to be any genocide, just let it be done with good old fashioned chemical weapons. Cause those kill fast and painlessy. But if any human tried that shit, it would have to be on a goverment scale (Try saying to a nuke silo operator "Come out and die, it's for the good of the world) or else civil war would break out.




DavetheFo

RogueDevil / Rogue Angel

50 XP

29th May 2003

0 Uploads

8,689 Posts

0 Threads

#7 12 years ago
Delta Force But if their is to be any genocide, just let it be done with good old fashioned chemical weapons. Cause those kill fast and painlessy.

Haaa, yeah, you're kidding right.

There is no way that they are fast and painless.




Young_Pioneer

Capitalize THIS!

50 XP

18th April 2006

0 Uploads

547 Posts

0 Threads

#8 12 years ago

An Ebola pandemic would be more efficient and "environment-friendly" than any chemical weapons ;).




Locomotor

in spite of erosion

50 XP

13th May 2004

0 Uploads

3,490 Posts

0 Threads

#9 12 years ago

It's about population control? Well of course wiping out the population is a good way of ridding the world of it. :rolleyes: Who exactly is he saving the Earth for?




Nusentinsaino

A new sense of nuisance.

50 XP

8th December 2003

0 Uploads

12,881 Posts

0 Threads

#10 12 years ago

Young_PioneerA natural pandemic killing 90% of the world's population could restore the ecological balance, change the political systems and ultimately help mankind to survive as a species.

But who wants to belong to the 90%?

Very true.

I would put all the the Christians, Muslim Extremists, Islamic Extremists, Dictators, Corrupted Authorities, The insane, The Mentally Retarded, unintelligent black/hispanic people, oh god... the list goes on... no wonder why he stated 90 percent.

Africa has to be the first target and an excellent testing grounds for the Ebola, because Africa is a chunk of bullshit.