Having Kids will destroy the word (And this woman is a moron) 48 replies

Please wait...

RadioactiveLobster Forum Admin

Jeff is a mean boss

565,314 XP

28th July 2002

0 Uploads

53,117 Posts

1,329 Threads

#1 10 years ago

Members of The Pub, I wish for you to meet the stupidest woman alive. Before you read the entire article, let me say this. I for one am GLAD this woman refuses to have kids, because she won't be spreading her flawed DNA around and adding more idiots to the world.

Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly | the Daily Mail

"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

While most parents view their children as the ultimate miracle of nature, Toni seems to see them as a sinister threat to the future.

Stupid people shouldn't have children, I agree there, but having children is a sin against the planet?? Don't make me laugh.


If there is no image, Mikey broke something...



Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#2 10 years ago

I agree with her. Breeding as we are now, or at least as some of us are is going to be the death of us all (or at least a future generation).

We're not doing to well with our resources as it is, the last thing we need is more people.




wjlaslo

I've defected to the Pies

50 XP

13th August 2004

0 Uploads

2,762 Posts

0 Threads

#3 10 years ago

That's just...stupid...in my opinion... Okay...You don't have children. Alright only thing wrong with that is well, you will never have children. Nice job (not). Okay...You have kids. Feeling so strongly against pollution and all those things, shouldn't having a child be okay as long as you just brainwash him into not doing these things? Seems remarkably easy, you've already brainwashd yourself. If we ALL follow your advice, I don't see the point in living at all. When nobody has anymore children and the human species dies out, then it's not like you've made a better world for anybody...just wiped out a species. Was that your intent? Killing another species?




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#4 10 years ago

Maybe they are people that are not too fond of "brainwashing".




wjlaslo

I've defected to the Pies

50 XP

13th August 2004

0 Uploads

2,762 Posts

0 Threads

#5 10 years ago

I don't see how they consider it brainwashing, just "aggressive conditioning". Really though I wonder how they came up with these ideas?




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#6 10 years ago
wjlasloThe2nd;4049907I don't see how they consider it brainwashing, just "aggressive conditioning". Really though I wonder how they came up with these ideas?

It's slightly disturbing when you appear to know what these people think and feel about unrelated issues without having talked to them. As for those idea's.. how did people come up with the idea that they could fuck, fuck, and fuck some more without consequence?




Crazy Wolf VIP Member

Snipes With Artillery

277,420 XP

22nd March 2005

0 Uploads

27,192 Posts

0 Threads

#7 10 years ago

The availability of contraceptives/quick blows to the uterus?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#8 10 years ago
Tas;4049774We're not doing to well with our resources as it is, the last thing we need is more people.

Not strictly true. We need less people in China, in the Middle East, in Africa, but in Europe (particularly Scandinavia) the birth rate is so low its almost zero, infact I think Sweden has a negative birth rate. Its not the amount of people in the world, its the distribution of said people. Also, if we don't have children, what is the point of marriage, what is the point of life really? To just sit on our bums collecting money for ourself and not supporting or caring for anyone else? Yay lets all be lonely, miserly old men/women with no friends or family and die alone. Way to go matey.




Tas

Serious business brigade

50 XP

4th September 2004

0 Uploads

7,275 Posts

0 Threads

#9 10 years ago
Squire James;4050017Not strictly true. We need less people in China, in the Middle East, in Africa, but in Europe (particularly Scandinavia) the birth rate is so low its almost zero, infact I think Sweden has a negative birth rate. Its not the amount of people in the world, its the distribution of said people.

True enough.

Also, if we don't have children, what is the point of marriage, what is the point of life really? To just sit on our bums collecting money for ourself and not supporting or caring for anyone else? Yay lets all be lonely, miserly old men/women with no friends or family and die alone. Way to go matey.

As for this, there are things called girl/boyfriends, just friends, and naturally your own sisters and brothers, mother and father etcetera for family. The whole "gotta breed" thing doesn't fallow any logical rules, and is simply "felt" by some people rather than thought about. It's not required for a happy life, as some people are clearly evidence of.




LIGHTNING [NL]

FH2 Developer

50 XP

30th May 2003

0 Uploads

9,811 Posts

0 Threads

#10 10 years ago
Squire James;4050017Not strictly true. We need less people in China, in the Middle East, in Africa, but in Europe (particularly Scandinavia) the birth rate is so low its almost zero, infact I think Sweden has a negative birth rate. Its not the amount of people in the world, its the distribution of said people.

There is no such thing as a negative birth rate.

Anyway, the point of this article is the overpopulation of our planet. With the current rate at which we consume its resources it cannot handle 6 billion people. We'll exhaust it until there is nothing left and then everyone will die. Now you do have a point. Overpopulation is not mainly caused by the 'rich' western world. In general, poor people will have many more children than rich people. And to have more children simply because you'll have a better chance at getting more money when you're older is selfish.

But to have your unborn child aborted because you're afraid its going to use up more of the earth's resources is just stupid. If you want to do something to save the world you should attack the problem (poverty in the 3rd world) not the symptoms (high birth rate in 3rd world).