Inmate requests execution by firing squad 69 replies

Please wait...


Biggest F-ing A-hole 2010

215,560 XP

24th April 2003

0 Uploads

18,771 Posts

0 Threads

#1 8 years ago

Inmate Requests Execution by Firing Squad

So the guy has been on death row for years, they dont say for what, but apparently Utah gives inmates a choice as to how they want to die.

This guy requested firing squad. Thats pretty badass.

But apparently the issue is raising bitches, moans and complaints over "cruel and unusual" punishment.

So, I have 2 points...

(1) Any punishment will be cruel and unusual in the case of a death sentence. The quickest way would be an artillery shell. So unless you want to lob a 155 round on the guy in the middle of a field, any method of execution might not kill right away.

(2) The guy has been sentenced to death. Let the guy choose how he wants it. The end result will be the same.


Loves Lamp

50 XP

3rd May 2009

0 Uploads

949 Posts

0 Threads

#2 8 years ago

it's not cruel if that's how he wants to go. the constitution is modernly used to protect people's rights. if that's how he wants to go, i don't see any need to appeal against it as unconstitutional. the only question is if it's doable.


shaken - not stirred

50 XP

9th June 2009

0 Uploads

8,262 Posts

0 Threads

#3 8 years ago

It shouldn't be considered "cruel and unusual" if that's the way he wants to die. If he's going to die, he should at least have some sort of say in how.

Emperor Benedictine

You can't fire me, I quit

55 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

2,437 Posts

0 Threads

#4 8 years ago

To be honest, the difference in degree of cruelty between shackling someone to a gurney and poisoning them to death, and having them stand in an open space to be shot in the back, does not seem all that considerable to me.

MrFancypants Forum Admin

The Bad

217,010 XP

7th December 2003

0 Uploads

20,003 Posts

6 Threads

#5 8 years ago

If this guy wants to be shot and if there are people willing to do the shooting then I don't see the big problem. It might even make some people happy. The media who are going to report about this, for example.

Commissar MercZ

Notable Loser

300,005 XP

29th January 2005

0 Uploads

27,113 Posts

0 Threads

#6 8 years ago

The only reason why they let him choose this is because he was sentenced before Utah began to phase the method out. Before 2004 I've read they were allowed to chose between the two.

The only thing this demonstrates is just how shit backwards Utah tends to be. But it's his choice and he gets to have a media circus out of it too.


5.56 smoke Haji every day

55 XP

18th July 2008

0 Uploads

8,397 Posts

0 Threads

#7 8 years ago

Of the options out there, firing squad actually sounds like the best to me. Getting poisoned, gas chamber, lynching, and electric chair all sound pretty awful. People explode in the electric chair.

Red Menace


415,758 XP

10th August 2004

0 Uploads

40,364 Posts

1 Threads

#8 8 years ago

If I was to be executed then I should be in a manner befitting my rank, I would choose firing squad as well. But seriously, I would probably choose firing squad if I had the choice, in all honesty it seems a lot less cruel and unusual than being gassed or electrocuted and with several marksman all aiming for your heart, much faster. Oh well, I guess I still have Oklahoma.


Nemmerle Forum Mod

Voice of joy and sunshine

298,365 XP

26th May 2003

0 Uploads

28,147 Posts

5 Threads

#9 8 years ago

It's not cruel. A .45 through the heart. Fairly dead fairly quick. I've been hurt bad before - massive surge of adrenaline, you don't even feel anything until the event is over. It's like you're a light as a feather, dancing on wind. What's cruel is injecting people with chemicals.

Unusual? Just by definition the death penalty is. But if I had to chose a way to go out I'd be right there with him. Firing squad please.

Crazy Wolf VIP Member

Snipes With Artillery

277,420 XP

22nd March 2005

0 Uploads

27,192 Posts

0 Threads

#10 8 years ago

I wonder if you can request where they aim? I'd have to think the fastest would be a removal of the brain-stem, not even destroying the heart should be as quick as that. He requested it, however the Constitution read literally with no background or complete understanding of its roles (or the specific role of the Bill of Rights) would prohibit any "cruel and unusual punishments [from being] inflicted" by the government. I really don't see what is particularly more cruel about this than any other method of execution, and we've killed too many people to really count the death penalty as "unusual". However, others apparently think that somehow injecting someone with a poison so they can feel themselves die is better than injecting them with hot lead so they can feel themselves die. Personally, I hate needles.