Intelligent Bush Debate 108 replies

Please wait...

Mihail Advanced Member

President of Novistrana

50 XP

19th January 2003

0 Uploads

15,509 Posts

0 Threads

#101 16 years ago

It's the time between dictators that a change can happen the most successfully without any ill effects, it's using a razor blade to making a insision over a machete, let me tell you, democracy was not born of itself, it was born of a despotism.




Force Recon

Semper fidelis

50 XP

10th July 2004

0 Uploads

2,637 Posts

0 Threads

#102 16 years ago
i'd love to hear how you propose that

I meant they could have brought charges against him first(which they did) and the Us troops could have stormed the city to search for Saddam instead of bombing the City and killing innocent people.However if the Iraqis(including kurds,shias and sunnis )live together live peacefully,I won't have a word against the United States.




SmallButFiesty

You = not me

50 XP

14th December 2004

0 Uploads

1,055 Posts

0 Threads

#103 16 years ago
rahmanI meant they could have brought charges against him first(which they did) and the Us troops could have stormed the city to search for Saddam instead of bombing the City and killing innocent people.However if the Iraqis(including kurds,shias and sunnis )live together live peacefully,I won't have a word against the United States.

I have to agree with you on that, why they bombed the city? i have no idea. i think they bombed some palaces where they though Saddams leaders were. but still i dont know why they did the bombing.




Mihail Advanced Member

President of Novistrana

50 XP

19th January 2003

0 Uploads

15,509 Posts

0 Threads

#104 16 years ago

Because there was a large percent of the city was loyal to saddam, especially the soldiers who were withdrawn into the city to protect them from allied missle strikes, but Saddam and his generals did not know the resolve of the "coalition forces", they did not know that the coalition forces would use plane and curise missiles within the city, a fatel error. Also news media buildings were targeted because they had satalites which could allow saddam's generals to guide attacks, and power stations were hit to kill any type of electronic communations, computers etc Saddam's bunkers were hit which were located under the city, his palace was hit as well. Bridges were targeted to cut the flow of civilians and soldiers in and out of the city leaving only bottle necks.




SmallButFiesty

You = not me

50 XP

14th December 2004

0 Uploads

1,055 Posts

0 Threads

#105 16 years ago
MihailBecause there was a large percent of the city was loyal to saddam, especially the soldiers who were withdrawn into the city to protect them from allied missle strikes, but Saddam and his generals did not know the resolve of the "coalition forces", they did not know that the coalition forces would use plane and curise missiles within the city, a fatel error. Also news media buildings were targeted because they had satalites which could allow saddam's generals to guide attacks, and power stations were hit to kill any type of electronic communations, computers etc Saddam's bunkers were hit which were located under the city, his palace was hit as well. Bridges were targeted to cut the flow of civilians and soldiers in and out of the city leaving only bottle necks.

bgood.gif




Big {Daddy}

Get in!

50 XP

2nd October 2003

0 Uploads

1,708 Posts

0 Threads

#106 16 years ago
NiteStrykerNot with the american justice system and the ACLU saying these guys deserve lawyers and fair trials.

Everyone deserves a fair trial. Nobody is above or below the law.

I hadnt heard of convitions in Britian but I heard of captures.

You haven't heard of convictions because no evidence has been produced to support the prosecution. Most are released soon after capture. We do convict and imprison terrorists, if found guilty.

What about all those people in Guantanamo Bay? Pre-invasion Afganistan was unique, because it was the only true Islamist state in the world. Islamists from all around the world flocked there to live their dream. The Northern Alliance saw the Taliban as a rival, and much stronger regional power. Come the invasion, they could kill two birds with one stone. Overthrow the the unwelcome foreigner rulers, and earn good money for handing over alleged terrorists to the CIA. The Northern Alliance had just won the lottery! I think you can work this one out.

Bush won't prosecute them because he can't produce any evidence to support the case. He can't release them because that would be "giving in to terrorism". The reality is that they are simply guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time (and perhaps of being religious morons ;) ). They have become something of an embarassment to Bush. A problem for the next president to resolve me thinks.

Jordan, Egypt, Russia, Britian, and US Intelligence said Saddam had WMD's

I can only speak for the British intelligence. It was a joke. Our weapons dossier was said to be so pathetic, Blair ordered the draft back to MI5 to be tarted up. It didn't contain nearly enough evidence to support the invasion. Ever heard of Dr. David Kelly (Iraq arms expert)? Found dead after condemning the lack of evidence.

Do you honestly think North Korea does not pose a threat?

I am not in the least bit concerned about them. It is my opinion that left unmolested, Kim Jong will live out his days in peace. When he dies, hopefully, the place will improve.

Mabey its because of the media bias in America but I dont see Bush as the war mongering individual you do. I dont see him as the evil dictator you do.

I don't see him as evil or a dictator. He's probably a nice guy out of work. However, I don't think he's doing a good job. He's not doing anybody any favours with this "with us, or against us" stance.




-DarthMaul-

I'm way cooler than n0e (who isn't though?)

50 XP

11th February 2003

0 Uploads

5,051 Posts

0 Threads

#107 16 years ago

Hussnie Mubarak is a retard, so egypt dosent count :p




NiteStryker

Biggest F-ing A-hole 2010

215,560 XP

24th April 2003

0 Uploads

18,771 Posts

0 Threads

#108 16 years ago
MihailWaiting for him to die, Nice and clean. Or a assassination.

Then you would be outraged that America goes around assassinating world leaders. :rolleyes:

Now had I said "assassination", you all would have got on my back about it, calling me bloodthirsty and what else you would think of.

I approve of Ann Coulter because her ideologies about liberals fit with mine. Because I have found her opinions about liberals when she talks with them are true to mine.

So if someone shares my ideology, why can I not side with them?

You all can *and I think some of you do* worship Moore all you want. I wont stop you. I think the man is crazy as hell, I dont agree with him on anything, but if you and him agree on a view, good for you.




lpu132

I post to get attention

50 XP

29th June 2004

0 Uploads

75 Posts

0 Threads

#109 16 years ago

after we proved they are terroists and not some kid drafted to fight, after that you can strap his asses to a nuke for all i care