I bet you 500 euros right now(not joking) that none of this will happen
I bet it won't happen either. I am just putting a what-if in. It is too early to tell though. We should wait at least until next year. Anyone read his spaceship part? Anyone find that strange at all? "Care to share with me how you solved the overheating problem on your space plane?"
come on, do people take this guy serious?
example Q: How far have computers and software progressed in 2036?
A: Good question! I would say the biggest difference is in the reliability of the hardware and software. It absolutely amazes me how willing people are here to accept computer and software failures on such a regular basis. I was very surprised to see how prolific it is. You can look forward to very stringent manufacturing parameters and programming discipline. Think back to the early days of the computer and how much work and cleverness it took to fit those programs into such small areas of memory. Has more and cheaper memory brought better programs or just more programs? As far as technical specifics, I'm afraid I cannot go into too much detail. However, I will tell you that processor speed and memory size take dramatic leaps forward.
1. reliable. pure logic. 2. a lot faster. allso, pure logic. 3. more memory. again, pure logic. 4. no details i wonder why?
this "prediction" will probably come true, but its all pure logic. i could have done this prediction myself. does that mean im a genious? or a timetraveler? no. it just means i have logic skills. thats all what John Titor is, a guy smart guy who has a gift for logic. and for the pictures of the "time machine" and the "military logo", i can make those right here if i want to, the only thing you need to make those photos is a camera, some cardboard, paint and maybe photoshop to work away some things. oh, and a LOT of spare time. with these things, you can make the same things as John Titor did.
this is not just bullshit, it's also old bullshit. didn't we talk about this before?
There are a few theories on where the story originated from.
The first is a strikingly similar storyline of a game called GURPS, by Steve Jackson Games
The second is more research done on some of the names he mentioned. It seems a phycisist, Dr. Hendrick van Hees from Germany, is behind the theory which Titor is explaining in bits and pices to whoever asks. If you search the good Drs documentations you can find similarities in his work, and some lines are quoted in Titors posts. They say one of his students did it basing it on IP tracking, student projects, and email ignorance from Van Hees.
conclusion: old stolen bullshit.
Yeah its all crap
Yea, it is all crap, I'm sure this guy is on speed or something.
I am from the future i can predict that this thread will be closed
And I say it will only be coincidence, or that you have a drug-habit.