2nd September 2002
[SIZE="1"]What's with all the sex-related topics lately?[/SIZE]
I believe circumcision, whether male or female, is genital mutilation.
Understandably, if the foreskin is sickened it should be removed, but there is absolutely no reason to remove a completely healthy piece of tissue. In regard to religiously motivated circumcision, what if the child rejects the parent's religion when he is an adult? What if the child interpretes the religion differently and comes to the conclusion that circumcision is not compulsary?
If men feel circumcision is necessary, then they can still have it done later with their own consent.
What are your opinions?
I'm too cool to Post
17th July 2003
It is usually done at a very early age. It is considered by many to reduce health risks though I question the validity of that.
This is not nam
6th December 2003
Yup, i prefere to take a shower.
I'm way cooler than n0e (who isn't though?)
14th April 2004
it has been proved in studies that having circumcision cuts the risk of aids significantly, it is so significant that a the risk of spreading aids through heterosexual sex decreased by 65% and UN is advocating mass circumcision in africa, ahh good to be back
Feel my heat, Heavens on fire.
3rd August 2005
I prefer the old fashion method of circumcision...just have your granny bite the en of it off!
For the Emperor! Knights of Caliban!
16th March 2004
Anlushac11;4174758It is usually done at a very early age. It is considered by many to reduce health risks though I question the validity of that.
Well when you wash your gentals you need to pull down the foreskin...and if some twit forgets to pull the fore skin back up and infection could settle in after all a nice warm dark place helps many infections grow.
[color=#000000][size=2][b][i]Heralds of the coming doom, Like the cry of the Raven, we are drawn, This oath of war and vengeance, On a blade of exalted iron sworn, With blood anointed swords
Serious business brigade
4th September 2004
I believe it is, parents should simply teach their children to wash properly. My parents had it done to me and its not overly dramatic, but a friend of mine needs to go through extreme lengths to feel anything at all.
well i havent had it done and i wouldnt have it done now as it can stop it from working properly when you older so ill be keeping my foreskin
yeah i read that study about the reduced chance of hiv so they should get snipping on the babies in africa
I chose an eternity of this
6th January 2005
yod@;4174785it has been proved in studies that having circumcision cuts the risk of aids significantly, it is so significant that a the risk of spreading aids through heterosexual sex decreased by 65% and UN is advocating mass circumcision in africa, ahh good to be back
Now that seems completely illogical. It may reduce the risk of infection, but there is NO way it could possibly lower the risk of STD's like AIDS. How could it? Not having a foreskin isn't going to stop a virus....
It makes it much easier when you jack-off... Take it from me. Well... I would assume it would.