North Korea agrees to end Uranium enrichment 5 replies

Please wait...

Commissar MercZ

Notable Loser

300,005 XP

29th January 2005

0 Uploads

27,113 Posts

0 Threads

#1 6 years ago

AFP: N. Korea 'agrees to suspend uranium enrichment'

SEOUL — North Korea has agreed to suspend its enriched-uranium nuclear weapons programme, a key United States demand for the resumption of disarmament talks, according to news reports.

Yonhap news agency and the Chosun Ilbo daily quoted an unidentified diplomatic source saying the Washington had also agreed to provide the North with up to 240,000 tonnes of food aid.

Pyongyang pledged "to implement initial measures of denuclearisation that include a suspension of its uranium enrichment programme," Yonhap said.

The North apparently agreed to put stricter and clearer monitoring systems in place to ensure that the food aid reached those most in need, according to the source, Yonhap said.

The agreements came when Robet King, US special envoy for North Korean human rights, met with Ri Gun, head of North American affairs at North Korea's foreign ministry, on Thursday and Friday in Beijing, the source said.

The reports could not be independently confirmed.

Suspending the uranium enrichment programme -- first disclosed by the North one year ago -- is a key demand of Washington's before six-party negotiations can resume.

The North quit the six-party forum -- which also includes China, Russia, Japan and South Korea -- in April 2009, one month before its second nuclear test.

Pyongyang has long said it wanted the six-nation talks to re-start, but without preconditions.

But the United States says the North must first show "seriousness of purpose" by shutting down the enrichment programme.

According to both Yonhap and Chosun Ilbo, the two countries were likely to hold a third round of talks this coming week in Beijing to discuss resuming the six-party talks.

Glyn Davies, the US special representative on North Korea, will likely meet with North Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye-Gwan in Beijing around Thursday, the source said.

North Korea was promised 500,000 tonnes of food aid from the United States when it dismantled part of its nuclear facilities in Yongbyon in 2008.

It had received 170,000 tonnes by the time the aid was suspended in 2009 as tensions worsened over the North's nuclear programmes.

Wonder how long will it take for them to restart it again, because I'm pretty sure this has happened before. Guess we can start a pot for guesses to how long until it decides to change plans again.




Asheekay

I live on Gaming Forums

50 XP

20th August 2008

0 Uploads

1,377 Posts

0 Threads

#2 6 years ago

In international politics, not friends, neither foes, nor the commitments are permanent. Only state-interests are permanent.

Enough said?




MrFancypants Forum Admin

The Bad

217,011 XP

7th December 2003

0 Uploads

20,003 Posts

6 Threads

#3 6 years ago

It seemed obvious that they'd use their nukes as a bargaining chip sooner or later. After all, they have more than enough conventional weapons to do prohibitive harm to the South in case of war. From what the article says the agreement seems to be that they won't build further nukes in exchange for food. A damned if you and and damned if you don't situation: the only chance of getting rid of that regime is its collapse, which a famine might bring about eventually. By sending them the resources they need to keep their citizens barely alive we support Kim. On the other hand, if we don't send them the food then many North Korean peasants are going to die. There is also no way of predicting how unrests in a place like North Korea would turn out.

I think it is sad that North Korea can get away with whatever they want these days. Build nuclear weapons, sink South Korean ships, bombard their islands with artillery and in the end they get free food for the kind of promise they have repeatedly broken in the past.




Red Menace

SCHOFIELD DID 4/30

415,758 XP

10th August 2004

0 Uploads

40,364 Posts

1 Threads

#4 6 years ago

Wonder if Kim Jong-Il was already dead when they agreed to this.


sigpic82523_3.gif</div></body></html>



Commissar MercZ

Notable Loser

300,005 XP

29th January 2005

0 Uploads

27,113 Posts

0 Threads

#5 6 years ago
Red Menace;5594577Wonder if Kim Jong-Il was already dead when they agreed to this.

As far as the leadership is concerned, he was already 'dead' when they decided on his successor. This was probably done with out much involvement from him.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#6 6 years ago

I must say that I really, really, REALLY doubt the North Koreans have really stopped uranium enrichment?

They have damned airbases dug into mountains, they could hide this easily if they wanted to, and I'm sure they want to.