Tribal Awakening or Rude Awakening in Iraq? 0 replies

Please wait...

Psychokenesis

I'm too cool to Post

50 XP

16th October 2003

0 Uploads

13,428 Posts

0 Threads

#1 10 years ago

airaqtribes1128uo1.jpgA Sunni volunteer refuses to be photographed in Muqdadiyah, Iraq. Franco Pagetti / VII for TIMEArticle

It's hard to tell these days whether the sands shift faster on the Tigris or on the Potomac. Four and a half years ago we invaded Iraq to disarm Saddam, or so we were told. When we found out Saddam had secretly gotten rid of his weapons of mass destruction, the justification for the invasion became to plant the seeds of democracy. Now, with intractable political gridlock in Baghdad, the reason it seems we're in Iraq is to promote a "tribal awakening" — unite Iraq's Shia and Sunni tribes in some grand tribal confederation. We're going to fight terrorism by turning the clock back to 7th century Arabia.

Stop Obsessing About Iran Distinguishing Iraqis from Iranians can be hard. Iraq‘s most revered cleric, Grand Ayatullah Husaini... The General vs. the Ambassador A U.S. Army soldier with 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division scan... The Betrayal of Sheik Sattar Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, leader of the Anbar Salvation Council, is pictured during a meeting in Anbar... The Case For Dividing Iraq Iraq is broken. Iraq‘s national-unity government is not united and does not govern. Iraqi security...

If I hadn't read it in Tuesday's White House press briefing, I would have taken the whole thing as a hoax. But indeed, on Tuesday Bush met with the head of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, Abd al-Aziz Hakim, to discuss the "tribal awakening."

Never mind that the last thing Hakim wants to do is hand power over to the tribes, his real objective being to turn Iraq into a Shi'a Islamic republic. Or that Iraq's tribes are no more ready than any other Iraqis to share power, equitably divide Iraq's oil revenues, or compromise on any of the other issues that are causing Iraqis to kill each other.

I know what life raft Bush is clinging to. The Sunni Arab tribes in Anbar province have in fact turned against the insurgency, and, yes, brought down the level of violence. But that doesn't mean Fallujah has turned into Crawford, Texas. Nor have the bombings in Baghdad stopped, even if the tribes have helped walk Iraq back from the abyss.

The Bush administration would like us to believe we picked up a new ally in the war on terrorism, that there's momentum on our side. In fact, the Administration has been so encouraged by the success in Anbar that it intends to use it as a template in Pakistan. In 2008, the Pentagon will nearly double the money it gives to the Frontier Corps, a Pakistani paramilitary force recruited from the tribes along the Afghan-Pakistani border. The Pentagon is hoping they will do what Pakistan's army couldn't, find bin Laden and drive the Taliban out into the open.

Before Bush puts on a burnoose and starts thinking he's Lawrence of Arabia, he needs to understand that Anbar's tribes came over to our side because they figured out that the only thing that stands between them and getting crushed by the Shia is our troops. They don't really care about our war on terrorism. He should also keep in mind that an estimated 40% or so of foreign fighters in Iraq are Saudis, another tribe that happens to be fighting on the wrong side. Tribes are tricky like that.

And then there's history, which the Iraqis can't seem to put behind them. The British tried to rule Iraq through the tribes and failed, spectacularly. They learned the hard lesson that Bedouin tribes are rented and never owned. They tend not to be there when you most need them. And they're certainly not going to substitute for the Iraqi state we destroyed in March 2003.

So maybe it's Bush who needs to put history behind him; the tribes can only be a band aid. As the old Persian proverb goes, "You can't draw water from a well with a rotten rope."

Robert Baer, a former CIA field officer assigned to the Middle East, is TIME.com's intelligence columnist and the author of See No Evil and, most recently, the novel Blow the House Down

It's an intresting Idea..one the britishes have tried before taming the nation through the trives of Iraq. They failed. For some reason Churchill comes to mind and I doubt he would have tackled this the way the US has and is going to .

We may live long enought to see this blow sky high right after the next president declares sucess in Iraq. Cooler heads don't prevail in the middle east From what I've seen grudges last a very very long time and the muslims are renowned for a long memory.

Your thoughts...