Who would you want leading a war on terror? 42 replies

Please wait...

NiteStryker

Biggest F-ing A-hole 2010

215,560 XP

24th April 2003

0 Uploads

18,771 Posts

0 Threads

#1 14 years ago

Very interesting question posed by Mr. Bill O'Reilly yesterday on the Radio Factor....

Who would you rather have as the leader in a war on terrorism?

Dick Cheney Or Micheal Moore?

While I dont like Cheney much, I think that a fight led by Moore would be scuicidal and a die-for-nothing cause...




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#2 14 years ago

The day Michael Moore or Hillary Clinton ever get presidency is the day I move away from America, literally. But Michael Moore will never be president, thankfully. Hillary on the other hand....eww.

Anyways, I would rather Dick Cheney lead. Just because Michael Moore probably wouldn't have taken very much action after 9/11.




Col Jimmy Emeric

Led Zeppelin pwns all

50 XP

16th April 2004

0 Uploads

3,149 Posts

0 Threads

#3 14 years ago
ArseholeAnyways, I would rather Dick Cheney lead. Just because Michael Moore probably wouldn't have taken very much action after 9/11.

Michael Moore would probably thatn the terrorists for giving him something to make a movie out of i'd rather have Cheney lead the war rather than Moore




Octovon

Spaceman

54,945 XP

5th August 2003

0 Uploads

5,317 Posts

0 Threads

#4 14 years ago

Well the choice is an obvious Cheney, he's the only one out of the two that has at least some political experience. This seems to be just another typical Bill O'Reilly Neo-Con poll in a Big Cat, Small Mouse situation. Why not make that choice between Cheney and Edwards, or Cheney and Kerry? Because its easier to target someone who you know will lose if they're not a politician in a poll concerning politics. In which the only other choice for said topic is an actual seasoned [and evil] politician. Its like having a poll about "Who's better at basketball, Michael Jordan or Micharl Moore?", the choice is obvious due to the question posed by the poll.

Boo to Darth Cheney, I choose neither unless there is an actual contender in this poll against Cheney.




NiteStryker

Biggest F-ing A-hole 2010

215,560 XP

24th April 2003

0 Uploads

18,771 Posts

0 Threads

#5 14 years ago

While I dont agree with your point...It is a fair one




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#6 14 years ago

If it were Cheney or Edwards or Kerry, I would still pick Cheney because Kerry and Edwards want to go out "diplomatic." You can not diplomatically reason with terrorism. You need an iron fist. Go out and kill the little bastards. Now not to mistake Iraq in this, but the WOT movement itself.




!moof

Note to self: Find pants.

50 XP

19th October 2002

0 Uploads

2,321 Posts

0 Threads

#7 14 years ago

Neither Kerry nor Edwards advocate negotiating with terrorists. Where did you get this idea?




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#8 14 years ago

From what I have heard, they said they would have taken care of this whole thing from 9/11 diplomatically. I may be wrong and they might have just been talking about Iraq, not the WOT itself. If someone would do to find a link, that would be great. Oh and so far Bush leads Kerry by a wide margin in the WOT.




Lord Wiener VIP Member

Piercing the veil.

51 XP

9th August 2003

0 Uploads

19,761 Posts

0 Threads

#9 14 years ago

Moore would only seek to end Bush's reign of terror.


WouldYouKindly.png



AzH

I'm too cool to Post

269,650 XP

17th September 2003

0 Uploads

24,050 Posts

0 Threads

#10 14 years ago

doesn't matter who leads it, you are still gonna lose.