Annoyed? -1 reply

  • 1
  • 2

Please wait...

WhiteDragon_Tru

Just a lonely little dragon

50 XP

5th December 2005

0 Uploads

1,679 Posts

0 Threads

#1 13 years ago

okay.. i have like.. every single sim game there is and what really gets me peeved is this : they wear censors! wtf is up with that?? their genetic make-up makes them look exactly like a barbie and ken doll. so why the hell to they blurr them? the game is rated T for teen, anyways. so what if alittle kid sees it? i dont think its right that they should blurr them since they look like barbie dolls anyways.. the creators of this game are seriously messed up if they think a barbie doll wearing no clothes is "adult content" when in fact its perfectly fine for ALL ages.... unless their parents are really screwed up or somethign and forbid naked dolls.. but ANYONE that has a daughter (or in my case a sister) will know that theres a really hard time to make her keep the clothes on her dolls when she thinks that they are people to and need to change for bed time... -sighs-.. back to my rant.... does anyone else find that darn censor annoying?:confused:




Trauma Sensei

The All Seeing Eye

50 XP

5th June 2004

0 Uploads

1,591 Posts

0 Threads

#2 13 years ago

I do not think you actually get the point of adding censorship to something, the authors probably thought it was important to emphasize the fact that young kids should not be able to see things that thy will probably not understand. Even if they removed the censorship and the model had no sex organ, the kid might think that such is the natural form of the body, and if he/she notices that he/she does have sex organ (not that they know what that part is) he/she will get confused and think of him/herself as some kind of abberrated being.




Emperor Benedictine

You can't fire me, I quit

55 XP

16th April 2005

0 Uploads

2,437 Posts

0 Threads

#3 13 years ago

Well, it's simple...realism. They know sims just look like dolls underneath, but that just isn't very realistic. The censor grid is there to give the impression that naked sims don't just look like dolls. :)




axeblade

SSJ2 Vegeta

50 XP

22nd July 2005

0 Uploads

182 Posts

0 Threads

#4 13 years ago

The blur is not only annoying, in sims2 it'll slow down your games framerate just by showing up/being there. It's worth removing, just for that...




WhiteDragon_Tru

Just a lonely little dragon

50 XP

5th December 2005

0 Uploads

1,679 Posts

0 Threads

#5 13 years ago
Trauma SenseiI do not think you actually get the point of adding censorship to something, the authors probably thought it was important to emphasize the fact that young kids should not be able to see things that thy will probably not understand. Even if they removed the censorship and the model had no sex organ, the kid might think that such is the natural form of the body, and if he/she notices that he/she does have sex organ (not that they know what that part is) he/she will get confused and think of him/herself as some kind of abberrated being.

which is why little kids shouldnt play it anyways, most arent able to use the controls properly and besides, if they think that then they should talk to their parents.

The blur is not only annoying, in sims2 it'll slow down your games framerate just by showing up/being there. It's worth removing, just for that...

thank you! ^_^ thats another reason i dont like that darned censor ^_^




Amy

Naughty

50 XP

28th October 2004

0 Uploads

3,443 Posts

0 Threads

#6 13 years ago

Well, theres ways around the censor which we all know, and theres ways around the whole "barbie" look as well.. Hence why EA added that lil censor do hicky lol,, some kids know the ways around that stuff, some dont, some know lil ways such as mods and such, some also dont know ya need one to work with another etc etc.. Tis the breaks I guess.. Just EA trying to stay away from the M rating, which it would get if all things was in place,, its not there target audience for sure.. Checks and balances people.. Remember that....




WhiteDragon_Tru

Just a lonely little dragon

50 XP

5th December 2005

0 Uploads

1,679 Posts

0 Threads

#7 13 years ago

i know there are programs to get rid of the censors (i have them) but i still dont like having to search 20 + sites to find the newst ones, if they have just a plain baribe look they should not be blurred.. like like other games that dont blurr thenbecause they back them wear underwear




Trauma Sensei

The All Seeing Eye

50 XP

5th June 2004

0 Uploads

1,591 Posts

0 Threads

#8 13 years ago

WhiteDragon_Trui know there are programs to get rid of the censors (i have them) but i still dont like having to search 20 + sites to find the newst ones[/QUOTE] The newest ones? why would you need more than ONE?

[QUOTE=WhiteDragon_Tru]if they have just a plain baribe look they should not be blurred.. like like other games that dont blurr thenbecause they back them wear underwear

You maybe missed what I stated on my post, do you have any argument against my statement?




Amy

Naughty

50 XP

28th October 2004

0 Uploads

3,443 Posts

0 Threads

#9 13 years ago
WhiteDragon_Trui know there are programs to get rid of the censors (i have them) but i still dont like having to search 20 + sites to find the newst ones, if they have just a plain baribe look they should not be blurred.. like like other games that dont blurr thenbecause they back them wear underwear

No need for lots of searching for them,, one lpace has 2 mods that takes care of it all, one for the blur and one to change the bodies, but Iam not gonna advertise that place here..




WhiteDragon_Tru

Just a lonely little dragon

50 XP

5th December 2005

0 Uploads

1,679 Posts

0 Threads

#10 13 years ago

no arguments..yet..lol... i just dont see why they censor them if they are so plain looking.. sure they are worried about getting sued form incomitent parents that dont realize that their is nothing wrong with a plain body such as they have in the sims/2.




  • 1
  • 2