Should Generals have a navy? -1 reply

Please wait...

Silver Mobius

Spectre

50 XP

25th March 2003

0 Uploads

192 Posts

0 Threads

#1 18 years ago

Tell me what you think.




The One Red Flag

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

14th May 2003

0 Uploads

17 Posts

0 Threads

#2 18 years ago

I think they should have a navy, although they should have a navy base2 make the ships, instead of them coming out of the war factory. I think that the game could do with more units and the maps bigger and more sea 2 have navy battles. Each team should have about 3-4 ships and5-6 new units i.e tanks and menand some new builings:p If some were 2 do this than it would b the dogs ballocks:naughty:




The One Red Flag

I don't spend enough time here

50 XP

14th May 2003

0 Uploads

17 Posts

0 Threads

#3 18 years ago

I know that there r modes 4 this game but it stiil does not make the map bigger. U could hav 1 CD that has maps on it so big that u could only have 2 maps on 1 CD:smokin:

CHINA:lol:




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#4 18 years ago

pfff what a stupid question... OF COURSE GENERALS NEEDS NAVAL UNITS!!! I want to play battleship:) soviet power supreme!




ErDb33rjOgHuRt

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

19th March 2003

0 Uploads

844 Posts

0 Threads

#5 18 years ago

Hmm yeah it needs a navy but for the GLA. The GLA needs some power boost. the mod that is out their only adds big battleships to the USA and China. The gla has some little piece of junk boat that can't do shit :(.




TopGuns017

Air Force General

50 XP

17th May 2003

0 Uploads

2 Posts

0 Threads

#6 18 years ago

of course there should be a navy i was sooo disappointed when i found out there wasnt. i mean, how cool would it be to have an aircraft carrier bigger than your base that u can build and launch aircraft like Tomcats and Seahawks from?? :rock: and dont forget destroyers and subs. then u could have huge online naval battles like :fistpunch: :fistpunch:




ErDb33rjOgHuRt

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

19th March 2003

0 Uploads

844 Posts

0 Threads

#7 18 years ago

That is was i was expecting from the game. They should've made bigger maps so you could have long lasting fights with naval ships, aircrafts and all sorts of things. Also why didn't they use vehicles that are actually used in the world?? I mean ok A10 is there but still. they should've included some realistic units.




Etherealsilk

Addicted to GF

50 XP

29th March 2003

0 Uploads

244 Posts

0 Threads

#8 18 years ago

Should a war game that simulates modern combat have land, air and SEA units. I would think so, yes. But, with the computer power needed just for the small and medium sized maps I dont think its very feasable to put in a navy. Everyone agree's that there need to be larger maps for a navy. But larger maps would bump up the min specs required for the game. Plus, it would be difficult to balance all three sides out with naval units. And, I still have nightmares of hunting down submarines from RA when a person was being a sore loser and wanted to make the game last as long as possible. Bastards.




ErDb33rjOgHuRt

I follow teh Moo!

50 XP

19th March 2003

0 Uploads

844 Posts

0 Threads

#9 18 years ago

Yeah i remember this. Damn submarines. But they would add a great strategic aspect to the game. Yes it would prolly bumb up the system req. But it would be worth it :D.




Guest

I didn't make it!

0 XP

 
#10 18 years ago

yeah can't w8, chinese nuclear submarines, would b so cool:) btw, u won't have 2 hunt down all the subs in generals, all u have 2 do is wreck their buildings:agreed: :agreed: :agreed: