Weekly Poll Results - Your Opinion on C&C expansions.

Please wait...

This article was written on an older version of FileFront / GameFront

Formatting may be lacking as a result. If this article is un-readable please report it so that we may fix it.


Published by JohnWE 10 years ago , last updated 2 years ago


Your Opinion on C&C expansions. What do you prefer?

A balance of all three! (meaning a $60 expansion) 43.7% (191)

More campaign and FMVs. 20.1% (88)

Lots and lots of different factions. 19.2% (84)

More units to play multiplayer. 16.9% (74)

Total: 437
Start: 02-09-2009 20:30
Last: 02-16-2009 18:17


 #1 - Posted by: CnC_Fin (Member) on 02-09-2009 at 23:40
Simply balance of all three :D Zero Hour was great expansion and Kane's Wrath was great expansion:cool: I can easily pay 60 $ for that

 #2 - Posted by: deathM (Member) on 02-10-2009 at 04:52
i'd say more units for mutliplayer,but new factions give way more new units so... xD (and no,i don't mean subfaction)

 #3 - Posted by: Nitronumber9 (Staff) on 02-10-2009 at 08:24
More weapons, gotta be more toys for me to play with.

 #4 - Posted by: anazonda (Staff) on 02-10-2009 at 12:11
Singleplayer. All Unit-Expansions do are add additional units that people can spam and rush. And a game that takes less than 30 minutes is boring.

 #5 - Posted by: Dark_Sasuke (Member) on 02-10-2009 at 14:23
I voted a balance of all three. Take Starcraft: Broodwar for example. It didn't add a new faction, but it had 3 new campaign and new units for each faction. I'd pay $60 for that.

 #6 - Posted by: baskev (Member) on 02-13-2009 at 16:23
all three + 1 other !!!! Less micro managment it's to much now.

 #7 - Posted by: Ayaz (Member) on 02-13-2009 at 19:59
All four of them are necessary

Comments on this Article

There are no comments yet. Be the first!